Exam 12: Negligence: Element II: Breach of Duty
Exam 1: Introduction to Tort Law and Practice31 Questions
Exam 2: Foreseeability in Tort Law17 Questions
Exam 3: Battery25 Questions
Exam 4: Assault20 Questions
Exam 5: False Imprisonment and False Arrest33 Questions
Exam 6: Misuse of Legal Proceedings24 Questions
Exam 7: Infliction of Emotional Distress21 Questions
Exam 8: Conversion and Trespass to Chattels16 Questions
Exam 9: Strict Liability23 Questions
Exam 10: Negligence: a Summary14 Questions
Exam 11: Negligence: Element I: Duty31 Questions
Exam 12: Negligence: Element II: Breach of Duty79 Questions
Exam 13: Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause33 Questions
Exam 14: Negligence: Element Iv: Damages43 Questions
Exam 15: Negligence: Defenses29 Questions
Exam 16: Products Liability50 Questions
Exam 17: Survival and Wrongful Death20 Questions
Exam 18: Torts Against and Within the Family27 Questions
Exam 19: Torts Connected With Land47 Questions
Exam 20: Defamation38 Questions
Exam 21: Invasion of Privacy19 Questions
Exam 22: Misrepresentation, Tortious Interference, and Other Torts33 Questions
Exam 23: Additional Tort Defenses50 Questions
Exam 24: Workers Compensation25 Questions
Select questions type
Explain how the breach-of-duty equation helps determine what a reasonable person would have done.
Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
If the danger of a serious accident outweighs the burden or inconvenience of taking precautions to avoid the accident, the reasonable person would take those precautions; furthermore, the more important or socially useful the activity, the more risks the reasonable person is willing to take.
Match the following
Premises:
carelessly monitoring an incompetent person
Responses:
deep pockets
defensive medicine
English rule
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
Free
(Matching)
4.7/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Match the following
Premises:
an assumption or theory to be proved
Responses:
factor
joint and several liability
hypothesis
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
Free
(Matching)
4.9/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
Match the following
Premises:
how a business or profession has acted in the past
Responses:
negligence per se
res ipsa loquitur
risk-benefit analysis
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.7/5
(38)
Distinguish between the reasonable patient standard and the reasonable doctor standard in determining whether a patient has provided informed consent.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)
Match the following
Premises:
losing party pays other side's attorney fees
Responses:
English rule
strict liability
respondeat superior
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(37)
Under the ________ rule, the amount of damages caused by the tortfeasor shall not be reduced by any injury-related funds received by the plaintiff from sources independent of the tortfeasor.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)
Match the following
Premises:
each defendant is responsible individually and together
Responses:
res ipsa loquitur
breach of duty
risk-benefit analysis
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(32)
Match the following
Premises:
conduct a reasonable person would take to avoid injury
Responses:
hypothesis
negligence per se
family purpose doctrine
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(35)
Match the following
Premises:
the employer is responsible for the tort of the employee
Responses:
deep pockets
negligent supervision
English rule
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(27)
Physically, a reasonable person has the same strengths and weaknesses as the defendant.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Match the following
Premises:
the employer answers for the tort of the employee
Responses:
subjective standard
family purpose doctrine
custom
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(36)
Match the following
Premises:
only the employee is liable due to this deviation
Responses:
family purpose doctrine
respondeat superior
standard
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(43)
Match the following
Premises:
one of the circumstances to be weighed
Responses:
standard
respondeat superior
res ipsa loquitur
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(25)
Reasonableness is determined primarily by an objective standard.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
Someone who has assets with which to pay a judgment is said to have ________.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
The defendant is expected to know that matches can cause dangerous fires even if the defendant's mental illness prevents him or her from knowing this.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(40)
Showing 1 - 20 of 79
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)