Exam 4: Obtaining Evidence and the Fourth Amendment
Exam 1: The American Criminal Court System75 Questions
Exam 2: Some Important Underlying Concepts78 Questions
Exam 3: Forms of Evidence79 Questions
Exam 4: Obtaining Evidence and the Fourth Amendment78 Questions
Exam 5: Searches and Arrests With Warrants80 Questions
Exam 6: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement80 Questions
Exam 7: Self-Incrimination, Confessions, and Identification Procedures80 Questions
Exam 8: Witness Competency, Credibility, and Impeachment78 Questions
Exam 9: Examining Witnesses79 Questions
Exam 10: Testimonial Privileges79 Questions
Exam 11: The Hearsay Rule79 Questions
Exam 12: Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule80 Questions
Exam 13: How Different Types of Evidence Are Introduced79 Questions
Exam 14: Wrongful Convictions80 Questions
Select questions type
A hotel room is considered a house for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)
Generally, the use of a device that enhances the senses, instead of replaces the senses, is not considered a search.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(46)
Literally millions of pages of text are devoted to the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Courts rarely look at individuals' subjective expectation of privacy, opting instead to focus on a more general societal expectation of privacy.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)
This court case ruled that the conversation that took place between the defendant in the case and a government official did not qualify as an unlawful search as the defendant was knowingly and voluntarily in the official's suite.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
This interpretation of the warrant clause says warrants should always be secured whenever it is practical to do so.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Interpretation of the warrant clause in the Fourth Amendment addresses the meaning of "reasonableness."
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
Persons traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their movements from one place to another
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court rule that searches should be evaluated based upon expectations of privacy rather than property interests?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
This interpretation of the warrant clause says there must be a warrant to permit search, barring only inherent limitations upon that requirement when there is a good excuse for not getting a search warrant.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
Administrative justification requires probable cause but not reasonable suspicion.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that searches by regulatory officials conducting health and safety inspections can be considered governmental actions.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Which of the following is not a factor in distinguishing between open fields and curtilage?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)
Which court case established the four separate factors of distinguishing between open fields and curtilage as a result of police climbing over several fences where they looked inside the defendant's barn?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
People always enjoy a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(43)
Showing 61 - 78 of 78
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)