Exam 7: Whistle-Blowing: Should You Ever Break With Protocol
Is Edward Snowden a hero or a traitor? Explain.
The question of whether Edward Snowden is a hero or a traitor is a highly debated and controversial topic. Some people view him as a hero for exposing the mass surveillance programs conducted by the NSA and bringing attention to the issue of government overreach and invasion of privacy. They argue that his actions were in the public interest and helped to spark important conversations about civil liberties and government transparency.
On the other hand, others see Snowden as a traitor for leaking classified information and potentially compromising national security. They argue that his actions put lives at risk and undermined the work of intelligence agencies. Additionally, they believe that he should have followed proper channels for addressing his concerns rather than leaking sensitive information to the media.
Ultimately, whether one views Edward Snowden as a hero or a traitor often depends on their perspective on government surveillance and whistleblowing. It's a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides, and the debate is likely to continue for years to come.
In the BER case, Engineer A discovered that Engineer A's company, SPQ, was cheating a vendor by using software in violation of agreement. Upon learning of this wrongdoing, Engineer A responded by reporting SPQ on a confidential hotline. BER determined this act of whistle-blowing to be unethical. All of the following considerations supported their conclusion except
D
Which of the following accurately describes the case of whistle-blowing of Mr. Vokes against TransCanada over their pipelines for violating safety guidelines?
D
The complicity-avoiding view takes you to be obliged to blow the whistle if and only if (l) what you will reveal derives from your work for an organization; (2) you are a voluntary member of that organization; (3) you believe that the organization, though legitimate, is engaged in serious moral wrongdoing; and (4) you believe that your work for that organization will contribute (more or less directly) to the wrong if (but not only if) you do not publicly reveal what you know and your beliefs are true and justified. What sort of case calls the necessity of these criteria in question?
The fact that whistle-blowers are generally deeply involved in the activity they reveal is thought by some theorists to show that
What is the best objection to the complicity-avoiding defense of whistle-blowing?
According to DeGeorge's harm-preventing view, whistle-blowing which of the following conditions is not necessary for whistle-blowing to be morally permissible?
Which element of whistle-blowing is absent from the following case: An engineer knows that his company is breaking the law by periodically allowing untreated wastewater with a low pH into the sewer, creating a risk of killing the bacteria at the municipal wastewater treatment plant. The engineer sabotages the company's discharge creating a spill that draws the attention of the authorities and then explains to them what the company has been doing.
What might be the missing element of responsible whistle-blowing in the following scenario? One employee, Amy, tells another employee, Bob, that she has seen the company pass sensitive data on to clients in a way that violates user privacy. Bob then makes a report to the authorities.
On the harm-preventing view, which condition is one of the two necessary conditions to make whistle-blowing morally obligatory?
According to Michael Davis's complicity-avoiding view, whistle-blowing is morally permissible if
Michael Davis summarizes his complicity-avoiding account of whistle-blowing in six criteria. In his view, you are obliged to blow the whistle just in case (1) what you will reveal derives from your work for an organization; (2) you are a voluntary member of that organization; (3) you believe that the organization, though legitimate, is engaged in serious moral wrongdoing; (4) you believe that your work for that organization will contribute (more or less directly) to the wrong if (but not only if) you do not publicly reveal what you know; (5) you are justified in beliefs (3) and (4); and (6) beliefs (3) and (4) are true. Which ethical theory offers the best support of this account of whistle-blowing?
According to Richard T. DeGeorge's harm-preventing view, whistle-blowing is morally permissible if a practice or product does or will cause serious harm to individuals or society at large,
Richard T. DeGeorge defends a harm-preventing view about whistle-blowing. In his view, it is permissible to blow the whistle just in case (1) a practice or product does or will cause serious harm to individuals or society at large; (2) the charge of wrongdoing has been brought to the attention of immediate superiors; and (3) no appropriate action has been taken to remedy the wrongdoing. Which ethical theory offers the best support of this account of whistle-blowing?
A whistle-blower is someone who passes along information about what he or she justifiably believes to be
Which identifies as the crucial condition for whistle-blowing a situation in which people cannot make informed consent without you revealing wrongdoing publicly?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)