Exam 22: Famine, Affluence, and Morality Peter Singer

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

In his argument for global poverty and the moral obligation to help those in need, Peter Singer acknowledges several practical problems that his argument faces. One of the main problems is the issue of feasibility and practicality in implementing his proposed solutions. Singer recognizes that it may be difficult to convince individuals and governments to make significant sacrifices in order to alleviate global poverty. Additionally, he acknowledges that there are complex political and economic barriers that may hinder the effectiveness of aid efforts.

In response to these problems, Singer argues that while it may be challenging to implement his proposed solutions, it does not diminish the moral imperative to address global poverty. He suggests that individuals and governments should still strive to make incremental progress and take steps towards reducing poverty, even if it may not be possible to completely eradicate it. Singer also emphasizes the importance of raising awareness and changing societal attitudes towards global poverty in order to create a more supportive environment for aid efforts.

While Singer's response to these practical problems is thoughtful and well-reasoned, some may argue that it is not entirely adequate. Critics may argue that Singer's proposed solutions are overly idealistic and fail to adequately address the complex political and economic realities that contribute to global poverty. Additionally, some may question the feasibility of convincing individuals and governments to make significant sacrifices in the pursuit of alleviating poverty.

Overall, while Singer's response to the practical problems facing his argument is compelling, it may not be entirely adequate in addressing the complex challenges of implementing his proposed solutions. However, his argument still serves as an important catalyst for discussions and actions towards addressing global poverty.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Peter Singer, a prominent ethicist, believes that the acceptance of his principle of effective altruism would have a significant impact on our moral conceptual scheme. He argues that it would shift our focus from traditional notions of charity and moral obligation towards a more rational and evidence-based approach to helping others. This would mean that individuals and societies would be more inclined to prioritize the most effective ways of reducing suffering and improving well-being, rather than simply following traditional or emotional impulses.

Singer believes that this shift in moral thinking would have positive effects on society. He argues that it would lead to a more equitable distribution of resources, as individuals and institutions would be more likely to allocate their resources to where they can have the greatest impact. This, in turn, would lead to a reduction in global poverty and suffering, as well as a more efficient use of resources for the betterment of society as a whole.

However, whether these effects are desirable is a matter of debate. Some may argue that Singer's principle could lead to a more utilitarian and calculating approach to morality, potentially diminishing the importance of empathy and compassion in our moral decision-making. Others may argue that it could lead to a more just and effective allocation of resources, ultimately leading to a more equitable and compassionate society.

In my opinion, the effects of Singer's principle are desirable. While it is important to consider the potential drawbacks, the overall impact of prioritizing effective altruism would lead to a more just and compassionate society. By focusing on evidence-based approaches to helping others, we can ensure that our efforts have the greatest impact and truly make a difference in the world. This shift in moral thinking would ultimately lead to a more equitable and compassionate society, making the acceptance of Singer's principle a desirable outcome.