Exam 6: The Implications of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Fran Bernat Simon Zschirnt Nicholas Godlove

The two-part test in Strickland v. Washington requires the defendant/appellant to show ineffective assistance of counsel because the attorney's representation

In Padilla v. Kentucky (2010), the court extended the right to effective assistance of counsel to cases where an attorney did not

In United States v. Cronic the Court stated that a presumption of ineffective assistance of counsel might occur if

Most ineffective assistance-of-counsel claims are raised on appeal using

Habeas corpus petitions are:

An attorney may not need to inform a client about __ to be considered effective.

In which of the following U.S. Supreme Court cases did the Court extend the right of counsel to capital punishment trials?

The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 does each of the following except

The U.S. Supreme Court used ABA standards to determine whether counsel was effective in

Which of the following would most likely be considered a tactical decision by an attorney and not ineffective assistance of counsel?