Exam 11: Perception and Action

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

How have our views of reaching to grasp been modified by experiments?

Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Our understanding of the process of reaching to grasp objects has been significantly enhanced by a variety of experiments in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and kinesiology. These experiments have provided insights into the complex coordination of sensory and motor systems, the role of perception and prediction, and the adaptability of the motor system. Here are some key ways in which experiments have modified our views of reaching to grasp:

1. **Motor Planning and Coordination**: Experiments using motion tracking and electromyography (EMG) have shown that the act of reaching and grasping involves a highly coordinated sequence of muscle activations. This coordination is planned in advance, with the brain preparing the movement before it is executed. This has led to a better understanding of motor planning and the role of areas such as the premotor cortex.

2. **Role of Vision**: Visual information is crucial for guiding the hand to the object. Experiments using visual perturbation techniques, such as shifting the visual appearance of an object's location, have demonstrated how the brain quickly adjusts motor commands to compensate for visual changes, emphasizing the importance of real-time visual feedback.

3. **Predictive Control**: Research has shown that the brain uses predictive models to anticipate the forces required to grasp different objects. This predictive control is based on past experiences and sensory cues, such as the object's size, shape, and perceived weight. Experiments involving lifting objects of unexpected weights have revealed how the motor system adapts to discrepancies between expected and actual sensory feedback.

4. **Affordances**: The concept of affordances, which refers to the properties of an object that suggest how it can be used, has been explored through experiments. Studies have shown that the way we reach for an object is influenced by what we intend to do with it, indicating that our grasp is not only shaped by the object's physical characteristics but also by its perceived function.

5. **Neural Mechanisms**: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and other neuroimaging techniques have helped identify the brain regions involved in reaching and grasping, such as the parietal and frontal cortices. These experiments have provided a deeper understanding of the neural pathways and processes involved in the transformation of visual information into motor actions.

6. **Development and Learning**: Studies on infants and children have shown that reaching and grasping skills develop over time and with experience. These experiments have informed our understanding of motor learning and the critical periods for developing fine motor skills.

7. **Adaptability and Plasticity**: Experiments involving tool use and prosthetics have demonstrated the brain's remarkable ability to adapt to new ways of reaching and grasping. This has implications for the design of assistive devices and rehabilitation protocols for individuals with motor impairments.

8. **Influence of Cognitive Factors**: Cognitive processes such as attention, intention, and decision-making have been shown to influence the reaching and grasping movement. Experiments that manipulate these cognitive factors have revealed their impact on the speed, accuracy, and coordination of the grasp.

In summary, experiments have greatly expanded our understanding of the intricate processes involved in reaching to grasp. They have highlighted the dynamic interplay between sensory input, motor planning, cognitive factors, and environmental context, all of which contribute to the seemingly simple act of grasping an object. This knowledge has important applications in areas such as robotics, prosthetics, and rehabilitation after injury or stroke.

Verheij et al. found that Maximum Grasp Aperture when picking up and object was related to:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

Time-To-Collision is thought to be important in:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

When an object appears in the path of the hand during a reach, how is behaviour affected?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)

How is the Size-Weight Illusion to be explained?

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(43)

Participants of Harris and Carré approached a target wearing prisms in several conditions. The experiments showed that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)

Makris et al. found that the nature of an object presented before a high or low tone primed participants to use a precision or a power grip in responding to the tones, but only when binocular vision was used. Their explanation for this was that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)

The attentional blink is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)

In their study presenting targets near to or away from the participant's hands, Reed et al. found:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

It should be impossible for a batter to hit a fast-moving baseball because:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)

A ballistic movement is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)

Prinz suggested that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(30)

Vainio et al. found, when presenting objects suitable for a power or precision grip, that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)

The importance of vision in maintaining posture is shown by:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

The time window with which a skilled batter can hit a moving ball can be as short as

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Behaviour in the swinging room shows that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)

Gozli et al. studied how well small stimulus changes could be detected for stimuli near or away from the hands. They found that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

In the Size-Weight Illusion:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)

Abrams et al. found that search for a target in an array of distractors was slower when the display was presented near the hands. They suggested that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

The Theory of Event Codes has been criticised because:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Showing 1 - 20 of 35
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)