Question 1

Mapp v. Ohio applied the exclusionary rule to state court proceedings.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False  True

Question 2

The statute of Title 42 United States Code § 1983 concerns _________________.

Accepted Answer

A)  civil liabilities of Congress 
B)  tort actions 
C)  civil remedies 
D)  police officer rights 
A)  civil liabilities of Congress 
B)  tort actions 
C)  civil remedies 
D)  police officer rights C

Question 3

Officers can be held liable for failing to intervene as another officer violates the civil rights of an individual.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False  True

Question 4

A supervisor and agency can never be held liable for the action of a subordinate.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 5

Police officers can claim qualified immunity during civil and criminal proceedings.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 6

The exclusionary rule excludes all evidence seized without a warrant.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 7

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 states that officers can be held _____________ for civil rights violations.

Accepted Answer

A)  civilly liable 
B)  criminally liable 
C)  tortuously liable 
D)  both a and b 
A)  civilly liable 
B)  criminally liable 
C)  tortuously liable 
D)  both a and b

Question 8

The _____________ states that unconstitutionally seized evidence will not be admitted at trial.

Accepted Answer

A)  Wolf v. Colorado 
B)  exclusionary rule 
C)  Bill of Rights 
D)  United States Constitution 
A)  Wolf v. Colorado 
B)  exclusionary rule 
C)  Bill of Rights 
D)  United States Constitution

Question 9

_______________ states that police agencies can be held civilly liable for the actions of the officers they employ.

Accepted Answer

A)  Limited liability 
B)  Tort law 
C)  Vicarious liability 
D)  The United States Constitution 
A)  Limited liability 
B)  Tort law 
C)  Vicarious liability 
D)  The United States Constitution

Question 10

Illegally seized evidence can be used for impeachment purposes.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 11

If unconstitutionally seized evidence would have been found at some point in the future, regardless of the unconstitutional search, the Court will allow this evidence to be admitted during trial via the _____________ exception.

Accepted Answer

A)  good faith 
B)  grand jury 
C)  inevitable discovery 
D)  impeachment 
A)  good faith 
B)  grand jury 
C)  inevitable discovery 
D)  impeachment

Question 12

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 allows individuals claiming civil rights violations to sue _______________.

Accepted Answer

A)  individual officers 
B)  police departments 
C)  municipalities 
D)  all of the above 
A)  individual officers 
B)  police departments 
C)  municipalities 
D)  all of the above

Question 13

An action fulfills the requirement of willfullness if the action was done voluntarily and intentionally.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 14

Mapp v. Ohio primarily concerns evidence seized by violating Fourth Amendment protections.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 15

The exclusionary rule is explicitly written in the Constitution.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 16

If officers act under the impression they have a valid search warrant and that warrant later turns out to be invalid, Courts may still admit the evidence by/for ______________.

Accepted Answer

A)  the good faith exception 
B)  impeachment purposes 
C)  grand jury proceedings 
D)  civil matters 
A)  the good faith exception 
B)  impeachment purposes 
C)  grand jury proceedings 
D)  civil matters

Question 17

Police officers can be held civilly liable for violating the civil rights of an individual.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 18

The plaintiff in a tort action must prove that _____________.

Accepted Answer

A)  the defendant had a duty 
B)  the defendant breached his/her duty 
C)  a breach of duty caused an injury to the plaintiff 
D)  all of the above 
A)  the defendant had a duty 
B)  the defendant breached his/her duty 
C)  a breach of duty caused an injury to the plaintiff 
D)  all of the above

Question 19

The doctrine of ______________ states that cities can be held civilly liable for the actions of their police agencies.

Accepted Answer

A)  limited liability 
B)  tort actions 
C)  de jour liability 
D)  municipal liability 
A)  limited liability 
B)  tort actions 
C)  de jour liability 
D)  municipal liability

Question 20

The Exclusionary Rule was extended to all courts in ________________.

Accepted Answer

A)  Miranda v. Arizona 
B)  Wolf v. Colorado 
C)  Mapp v. Ohio 
D)  Gideon v. Wainwright 
A)  Miranda v. Arizona 
B)  Wolf v. Colorado 
C)  Mapp v. Ohio 
D)  Gideon v. Wainwright

Mapp v. Ohio applied the exclusionary rule to state court proceedings.

The statute of Title 42 United States Code § 1983 concerns _________________.

Officers can be held liable for failing to intervene as another officer violates the civil rights of an individual.

A supervisor and agency can never be held liable for the action of a subordinate.

Police officers can claim qualified immunity during civil and criminal proceedings.

The exclusionary rule excludes all evidence seized without a warrant.

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 states that officers can be held _____________ for civil rights violations.

The _____________ states that unconstitutionally seized evidence will not be admitted at trial.

_______________ states that police agencies can be held civilly liable for the actions of the officers they employ.

Illegally seized evidence can be used for impeachment purposes.

If unconstitutionally seized evidence would have been found at some point in the future, regardless of the unconstitutional search, the Court will allow this evidence to be admitted during trial via the _____________ exception.

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 allows individuals claiming civil rights violations to sue _______________.

An action fulfills the requirement of willfullness if the action was done voluntarily and intentionally.

Mapp v. Ohio primarily concerns evidence seized by violating Fourth Amendment protections.

The exclusionary rule is explicitly written in the Constitution.

If officers act under the impression they have a valid search warrant and that warrant later turns out to be invalid, Courts may still admit the evidence by/for ______________.

Police officers can be held civilly liable for violating the civil rights of an individual.

The plaintiff in a tort action must prove that _____________.

The doctrine of ______________ states that cities can be held civilly liable for the actions of their police agencies.

The Exclusionary Rule was extended to all courts in ________________.

Introduction

Police Power and Limitations

Police Authority to Detain

Law of Arrest

Search and Seizure With a Warrant

Search and Seizure Without a Warrant

Specialized Searches Without a Warrant: Vehicles, Dogs, and Technology

Questioning Suspects

Pretrial Identification Procedures

Filters

Exam 2: Results of Failure to Comply With Constitutional Mandates

Mapp v. Ohio applied the exclusionary rule to state court proceedings.

The statute of Title 42 United States Code § 1983 concerns _________________.

Officers can be held liable for failing to intervene as another officer violates the civil rights of an individual.

A supervisor and agency can never be held liable for the action of a subordinate.

Police officers can claim qualified immunity during civil and criminal proceedings.

The exclusionary rule excludes all evidence seized without a warrant.

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 states that officers can be held _____________ for civil rights violations.

The _____________ states that unconstitutionally seized evidence will not be admitted at trial.

_______________ states that police agencies can be held civilly liable for the actions of the officers they employ.

Illegally seized evidence can be used for impeachment purposes.

If unconstitutionally seized evidence would have been found at some point in the future, regardless of the unconstitutional search, the Court will allow this evidence to be admitted during trial via the _____________ exception.

Title 42 United States Code § 1983 allows individuals claiming civil rights violations to sue _______________.

An action fulfills the requirement of willfullness if the action was done voluntarily and intentionally.

Mapp v. Ohio primarily concerns evidence seized by violating Fourth Amendment protections.

The exclusionary rule is explicitly written in the Constitution.

If officers act under the impression they have a valid search warrant and that warrant later turns out to be invalid, Courts may still admit the evidence by/for ______________.

Police officers can be held civilly liable for violating the civil rights of an individual.

The plaintiff in a tort action must prove that _____________.

The doctrine of ______________ states that cities can be held civilly liable for the actions of their police agencies.

The Exclusionary Rule was extended to all courts in ________________.

Introduction

Police Power and Limitations

Police Authority to Detain

Law of Arrest

Search and Seizure With a Warrant

Search and Seizure Without a Warrant

Specialized Searches Without a Warrant: Vehicles, Dogs, and Technology

Questioning Suspects

Pretrial Identification Procedures

Filters