Exam 7: Deductive Reasoning: Propositional Logic
For complex arguments, the truth-table method should be used to check for validity.
False
What are rules of replacement? How and why are they used?
Rules of replacement are a set of logical equivalences that allow us to replace one statement with another statement that is logically equivalent. These rules are used in formal logic to manipulate and simplify logical expressions.
The rules of replacement are used to transform logical statements in order to make them easier to work with or to prove certain logical relationships. They are also used to show that two statements are logically equivalent, meaning that they have the same truth value in all possible scenarios.
For example, one of the rules of replacement is the double negation rule, which states that a statement is logically equivalent to its double negation. This means that if we have a statement "p", we can replace it with "not not p" and vice versa. This rule can be used to simplify complex logical expressions and make them easier to work with.
Another example is the rule of implication, which states that "p implies q" is logically equivalent to "not p or q". This rule can be used to transform conditional statements into disjunctions, which can be easier to work with in certain logical proofs.
Overall, the rules of replacement are used to manipulate logical statements in order to simplify them, prove logical relationships, and make them easier to work with in formal logic. They are an essential tool for anyone working with formal logic and are used to make logical reasoning more precise and rigorous.
This rule of replacement-[(p & q) r)] [p (q r)]-is called contraposition.
False
The terms but, yet, nevertheless, while, also, and moreover express logical conjunction.
The rules of propositional logic that stipulate that some statements are logically equivalent are known collectively as the
In the method of proof, the rules are not used jointly but are applied one at a time and once per line.
What is the difference between the inclusive and the exclusive interpretations of a disjunction?
The following is an accurate truth table for a conditional:
p q p\rightarrowq T T T T F F F T T F F T
A statement composed of at least two statements is called a _______ statement.
The four logical connectives of propositional logic are conjunction,
In a truth table for a two-variable argument, what are the truth values for the first guide column?
The following is an accurate truth table for a conjunction:
p q p\&q T T T T F F F T F F F F
The symbolic form of "Either disembodied spirits exist, or psychic hoaxes are rampant" is
What argument form does this truth table illustrate?
p q p\rightarrowq \simp \simq T T T F F T F F F T F T T T F F F T T T
What argument form does this truth table illustrate?
p q p\rightarrowq p q T T T T T T F F T F F T T F T F F T F F
The truth table for the following argument is:
a b a\&b \sima b T T T F T T F F F F F T F T T F F F T F
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)