Question 1

Give best response. A suggests B to give false evidence. B in consequence of the suggestion commits that offence :

Accepted Answer

A) A is guilty of abetting the offence and is liable to the same punishment as B because mere suggestion amounts to instigation. 
B) A is guilty of abetting the offence committed by B because mere suggestion amounts to instigation but B will not be liable for any offence. 
C) A commits no offence because mere suggestion to some one to do an illegal act is not an offence but B is liable under section 193 I.P.C. 
D) A commits no offence but B is liable for giving false evidence under section 193 I.P.C. 
A) A is guilty of abetting the offence and is liable to the same punishment as B because mere suggestion amounts to instigation. 
B) A is guilty of abetting the offence committed by B because mere suggestion amounts to instigation but B will not be liable for any offence. 
C) A commits no offence because mere suggestion to some one to do an illegal act is not an offence but B is liable under section 193 I.P.C. 
D) A commits no offence but B is liable for giving false evidence under section 193 I.P.C. A

Question 2

A asks his servants to beat B. The servant did so:

Accepted Answer

A) A is guilty of criminal conspiracy 
B) A is guilty of criminal assault 
C) A is guilty of abetment by instigation 
D) None of the above 
A) A is guilty of criminal conspiracy 
B) A is guilty of criminal assault 
C) A is guilty of abetment by instigation 
D) None of the above C

Question 3

Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of property extends to the voluntarily causing of death if the offence apprehended be of the following description:

Accepted Answer

A) House trespass under such circumstances as may be reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
B) Theft under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
C) Mischief under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
D) Public nuisance under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
A) House trespass under such circumstances as may be reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
B) Theft under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
C) Mischief under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
D) Public nuisance under such circumstances as may reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. D

Question 4

The father of the accused was attacked by the deceased and suffered a simple injury on his head, the accused in order to protect his father administered a fatal below on the chest of deceased with Ballam

Accepted Answer

A) The accused has no right of P.D.. 
B) The accused has the right of P.D.. 
C) Although accused has the right of P.D. he had exceeded it. 
D) None of the above. 
A) The accused has no right of P.D.. 
B) The accused has the right of P.D.. 
C) Although accused has the right of P.D. he had exceeded it. 
D) None of the above.

Question 5

Give best response. A is attacked by a mob who attempt to cause grievous hurt to him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob and he cannot fire without taking the risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. In this case :

Accepted Answer

A) A cannot claim the defence under section 106 because the right of private defence under this section permits taking of risk to cause harm to innocent persons only against deadly assault. 
B) A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children because section 106 permits taking of such risk in private defence. 
C) A is liable for the offence committed because the right of private defence in no case permits taking risk of causing any harm to innocent persons. 
D) A is not liable for any offence because the right of private defence justifies causing of any harm to avoid death or grievous hurt. 
A) A cannot claim the defence under section 106 because the right of private defence under this section permits taking of risk to cause harm to innocent persons only against deadly assault. 
B) A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children because section 106 permits taking of such risk in private defence. 
C) A is liable for the offence committed because the right of private defence in no case permits taking risk of causing any harm to innocent persons. 
D) A is not liable for any offence because the right of private defence justifies causing of any harm to avoid death or grievous hurt.

Question 6

A was stabbed by B. His brother in law when he forcibly took his wife from his father in law house.

Accepted Answer

A) B is entitled to the benefit of PD. 
B) B is guilty of causing death. 
C) B is not entitled to the benefit of PD., as A is doing lawful act. 
D) Cannot say. 
A) B is entitled to the benefit of PD. 
B) B is guilty of causing death. 
C) B is not entitled to the benefit of PD., as A is doing lawful act. 
D) Cannot say.

Question 7

Give incorrect response. A person abets the doing of a thing who :

Accepted Answer

A) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission the doing of that thing. 
B) Instigates any person to do that thing. 
C) Instigates any person to do a thing which must also be done. 
D) Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy and in order to the doing of that thing. 
A) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission the doing of that thing. 
B) Instigates any person to do that thing. 
C) Instigates any person to do a thing which must also be done. 
D) Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy and in order to the doing of that thing.

Question 8

Under Indian Penal Code, there can be abetment to:

Accepted Answer

A) A person of unsound mind 
B) An infant 
C) Both (a) and (b) 
D) All of the above. 
A) A person of unsound mind 
B) An infant 
C) Both (a) and (b) 
D) All of the above.

Question 9

In which of the following case the right of P.D. is executed:

Accepted Answer

A) A thief was held with his face down to ground to prevent his entrance by owner causing death of thief by suffocation. 
B) A person attacked by spear struck a below with a club causing death. 
C) In both case. 
D) In None of the above case. 
A) A thief was held with his face down to ground to prevent his entrance by owner causing death of thief by suffocation. 
B) A person attacked by spear struck a below with a club causing death. 
C) In both case. 
D) In None of the above case.

Question 10

Give incorrect response. Criminal conspiracy means :

Accepted Answer

A) An agreement between two or more persons to do or cause to be done a legal or an illegal act by improper means. 
B) An agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act. 
C) An agreement between two or more persons to do an act, which though not illegal by illegal means. 
D) An agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence. 
A) An agreement between two or more persons to do or cause to be done a legal or an illegal act by improper means. 
B) An agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act. 
C) An agreement between two or more persons to do an act, which though not illegal by illegal means. 
D) An agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence.

Question 11

A supplies food to a person who might go on a journey to the intended scene of the crime. A is :

Accepted Answer

A) Guilty of abetting an offence. 
B) Not guilty of abetting an offence. 
C) Cannot say. 
D) None of the above. 
A) Guilty of abetting an offence. 
B) Not guilty of abetting an offence. 
C) Cannot say. 
D) None of the above.

Question 12

The word INSTIGATE means :

Accepted Answer

A) To do unlawful act. 
B) To provoke, to incite. 
C) To cheat. 
D) None of the above. 
A) To do unlawful act. 
B) To provoke, to incite. 
C) To cheat. 
D) None of the above.

Question 13

A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. Under IPC:

Accepted Answer

A) A is guilty of abetting B 
B) A is not guilty of abetting B 
C) A is not guilty as C is not murdered 
D) None of the above 
A) A is guilty of abetting B 
B) A is not guilty of abetting B 
C) A is not guilty as C is not murdered 
D) None of the above

Question 14

Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of body extends to the causing of death if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right of private defence is of the following description :

Accepted Answer

A) An assault with the intention of compelling a woman to marry against her will. 
B) An assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
C) An assault with the intention of wrongfully confining a person under certain special circumstances. 
D) An assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust. 
A) An assault with the intention of compelling a woman to marry against her will. 
B) An assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death or grievous hurt. 
C) An assault with the intention of wrongfully confining a person under certain special circumstances. 
D) An assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust.

Question 15

Give the correct response :

Accepted Answer

A) Instigation necessarily connotes same suggestion or support or stimulates whether passive or active. 
B) Advice per se does not necessarily amount to instigation. 
C) Both (a) and (b). 
D) None of the above. 
A) Instigation necessarily connotes same suggestion or support or stimulates whether passive or active. 
B) Advice per se does not necessarily amount to instigation. 
C) Both (a) and (b). 
D) None of the above.

Question 16

Give the correct response

Accepted Answer

A) It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence. 
B) To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that act abetted should be committed. 
C) Both (a) and (b). 
D) None of the above. 
A) It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence. 
B) To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that act abetted should be committed. 
C) Both (a) and (b). 
D) None of the above.

Question 17

Which one of the following statement is correct?

Accepted Answer

A) In conspiracy, there is not distinction between principal and accessory 
B) In conspiracy principal and accessory are distinct 
C) There has to be a distinction between principal and accessory in all offences 
D) None of the above is correct. 
A) In conspiracy, there is not distinction between principal and accessory 
B) In conspiracy principal and accessory are distinct 
C) There has to be a distinction between principal and accessory in all offences 
D) None of the above is correct.

Question 18

The right of PD of property against theft continues till :

Accepted Answer

A) The assistance of public authorities is obtained. 
B) The property has been recovered. 
C) The offender has effected his retreat with the property. 
D) All of these. 
A) The assistance of public authorities is obtained. 
B) The property has been recovered. 
C) The offender has effected his retreat with the property. 
D) All of these.

Question 19

Some person, lawful tenant of Agriculture land having reasonable fear of being ejected by force, made a practice of keeping their clubs in readiness. They expected attack and one of them was killed in the fray.

Accepted Answer

A) Attackers are entitled to the right of P.D. 
B) Tenants are entitled to the benefit of right of Private defence. 
C) Both tenants and attacks can avail the right of private defence. 
D) Tenants are not entitled to the benefit as they were prepared to anticipated any attacks. 
A) Attackers are entitled to the right of P.D. 
B) Tenants are entitled to the benefit of right of Private defence. 
C) Both tenants and attacks can avail the right of private defence. 
D) Tenants are not entitled to the benefit as they were prepared to anticipated any attacks.

Question 20

The right of PD property extends to the voluntary causing of death against the following offences :

Accepted Answer

A) House breaking by night. 
B) Robbery. 
C) Mischief by fire. 
D) All of these. 
A) House breaking by night. 
B) Robbery. 
C) Mischief by fire. 
D) All of these.

Exam 7: The Right of Private Defense

Give best response. A suggests B to give false evidence. B in consequence of the suggestion commits that offence :

A asks his servants to beat B. The servant did so:

Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of property extends to the voluntarily causing of death if the offence apprehended be of the following description:

The father of the accused was attacked by the deceased and suffered a simple injury on his head, the accused in order to protect his father administered a fatal below on the chest of deceased with Ballam

Give best response. A is attacked by a mob who attempt to cause grievous hurt to him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob and he cannot fire without taking the risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. In this case :

A was stabbed by B. His brother in law when he forcibly took his wife from his father in law house.

Give incorrect response. A person abets the doing of a thing who :

Under Indian Penal Code, there can be abetment to:

In which of the following case the right of P.D. is executed:

Give incorrect response. Criminal conspiracy means :

A supplies food to a person who might go on a journey to the intended scene of the crime. A is :

The word INSTIGATE means :

A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. Under IPC:

Point out incorrect response. The right of private defence of body extends to the causing of death if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right of private defence is of the following description :

Give the correct response :

Give the correct response

Which one of the following statement is correct?

The right of PD of property against theft continues till :

Some person, lawful tenant of Agriculture land having reasonable fear of being ejected by force, made a practice of keeping their clubs in readiness. They expected attack and one of them was killed in the fray.

The right of PD property extends to the voluntary causing of death against the following offences :

Indian Penal Code and Criminal Jurisdiction

Criminal Conspiracy and Common Intention Under Indian Penal Code

IPC Sections and Criminal Liability

Justifiable Homicide, Consent, and Defence in the Penal Code

Legal Defenses and Principles in Criminal Law

Consent, Harm, and Defense in IPC

Abetment and Sedition Laws in the Indian Penal Code

Offences Related to Rioting and Unlawful Assembly

Criminal Offenses and Liability

Culpable Homicide and Murder in IPC

Legal Concepts and Definitions in Criminal Law

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas in Various Criminal Offenses

Theft, Extortion, Robbery, and Dacoity in IPC

Criminal Offences

Theft and Extortion

Exploring the Elements of Forgery and Related Offences in Criminal Law

Jurisdiction, Motive, and Defenses in Criminal Law

The Applicability and Limitations of Consent in Legal Cases

Indian Penal Code Ipc Offences

Offences Dealt Under Different Sections of the Law

Filters