Exam 17: Exploring the Elements of Forgery and Related Offences in Criminal Law

Z with intention to steal ornaments opened Y's box and found it empty. Which one of the following statements is correct? Z is:

In which one of the following cases criminal breach of trust has been committed?

Which one of the following in an essential ingredient of sedition?

X instigates Y to commit murder to Z, Y in consequence stabes Z but Z survives the wound. X is guilty of:

Assertion (A): A servant removes wrist watch from the table and keeps it concealed under the carpet in the same room for fear of being detected. He is guilty of theft. Reason (R): To be guilty of the offence of theft, a person must move and take away the property stolen. Directions: - the following item consist of two statements, one labeled as Assertion A and the other labeled as Reason R. You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer

In which of the following cases, the punishment must be 'simple':

A with intention to kill her husband, purchases some poison powder from a chemist who by mistake, dispensed plain sugar instead. She put the powder in a cup of tea and served it to her husband who drank it but did not die. Which one of the following statements is correct as far as the charge to attempt a murder is concerned?

Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty is

Marrying again during life time of husband or wife is punishable under Section.

Assertion (A): Where sister of X was being abducted by force from her parents house by her husband, X caused death of sister's husband in defence of the sister against an assault with intention of abducting her by force, it was held that the private defence of body extended in the above circumstances to the causing of death. Reason (R): The word abducting in Section 100 IPC includes abduction simpliciter. Direction: The following four items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether the reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answer to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.

In executing a sentence of solitary confinement, such confinement must not exceed

X a doctor informs his patient Y that he has cancer which is in its last stage. X requests Y to arrange his family affairs as he cannot survive for more than a couple of weeks. Y dies because of shock on hearing this X is

X and Y swimming in the sea, after a shipwreck got hold of a plank. The plank was not large enough to support both X, with no other option, pushed Y who was drowned. X has committed:

A obtained a sum of Rs. 10,000/- from B by putting B in fear of death. Which one of the following offences was committed by A?

There was a dispute between two brothers regarding some property matter. On a particular occasion wives of these two brothers were found quarrelling with each other. The elder of the two brothers came in and requested them to refrain from quarrelling. At that time the younger brother suddenly appeared and gave a lethal blow on the head of the elder brother who died after a few hours in the hospital. Which one of the following offences has been committed by the younger brother?

A cuts down a tree on Z's ground without his permission and takes it away without Z's knowledge

A is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one of the following situations can his offence be proved?

A servant collected money from the debtor of his master as authorised by him. The servant retained the money is because it was due to him as waves. He commits

X sees Z committing what appears to X to be a murder. X in exercise, to the best of his judgement, exerted in good faith, of the powers, which the law gives to all persons of apprehending murderers in the act, seizes Z in order to bring Z before proper authorities. But it turns out that Z was acting in exercise of his right of self defence. X is guilty of

X with a view of murdering Y enters Y's bedroom at night when Y is out of station. X is guilty of