Exam 3: Provisions and Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Exam 1: Code of Criminal Procedure, 197325 Questions
Exam 2: Sections and Powers Under CR PC, 197325 Questions
Exam 3: Provisions and Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197320 Questions
Select questions type
Power of High Court to confirm sentence or annul conviction is provisioned under:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
B
Section 362 of Cr. P.C. , 1973 deal with:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(24)
Correct Answer:
A
With intent to cause injury to B, A institutes a criminal proceeding against him, knowing that there is not just or lawful ground for such proceeding, and also falsely accuses B of having committed an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such charge. Applying Section 220 Cr. PC.:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
D
Which of the following deals with the summary procedure for punishment for non-attendance by a witness in obedience to summons?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
Which of the following provides for the right of person against whom proceedings are instituted to be defended?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Which of the following statements in NOT true according to Section 21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Which of the following deals with appeal from orders under Section 446 Cr. P.C.?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
The maxim "autrfois acquit , autrefois convit" is plea which can be raised by:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(42)
Which of the following deals with appeals from convictions under section 344, 345, 349 and 350 Cr. PC.?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Which of the following cases held that there is no conflict between sections 107 and 145 of Cr. P.C. The words in S.145 are mandatory, while the language of S.107 is discretionary.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Section 6 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deal with the provision relating to
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(45)
Section 125 of Cr. P.C. remains applicable as long as there is no divorce. The fact of divorce would have to be strictly proved to invite the application of the 1986 Act. This was held in:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)