Exam 3: Why War

Macro theories of war are rooted in biology and psychology.

Which level of analysis does Waltz say is the only complete level?

The behavior of soldiers on the battlefield leads us to conclude that ________.

A/An ________ international system is one in which a major state seeks to not recognize the rights of some states to exist and tries to overthrow them.

Which theory or theories of war might offer insight into their underlying causes but not their immediate causes?

Theories which focus on image and perception as causes of war argue that conflict is the result of ________.

If you were a policymaker and believed the previous-war theory, which of the following would you consider unlikely to cause another war?

Which theory of international relations is the macro level of analysis most closely associated with?

Macro theories of war assume that states' actions are determined by external forces more than internal forces.

According to liberal idealists like Norman Angell, what prevents war?

Should U.S. foreign policy be geared toward the spread of democracy and capitalism as a way to decrease the number of wars in the future? Which theories of conflict would support the affirmative position? Which theories of conflict would contend that this is not sufficient to prevent war?

The 2006 Israeli incursion into Lebanon is an example of which theory of war?

History is full of clearly analogous events so it's easy to understand a current situation by comparing it with a previous one.

What are the IR levels of analysis as proposed by Waltz?

How might theories of misinformation and theories of democracy and capitalism be related? Is it possible that misinformation can be reduced with the growth of particular institutions, namely democratic government and a free-market economy? Use examples in your answer.

Understanding war means more than just understanding when they start. It also means understanding how they are fought and won, how long they last, and why and when they end. What does Carl Maria von Clausewitz have to say concerning each of these? In your discussion, formulate arguments concerning at least two points that you agree with as well as two points that you disagree with.

Do you find the previous-war theory convincing? Is this theory of war sufficient in and of itself to explain the occurrence of war? Why or why not?

Explain the basic tenets of Marxist and liberal idealist theories of war. On what fundamental point do these two theories diverge? Are they in any way complementary? Which do you find best reflects reality? Use real-world examples to support your conclusions.

State-level theories of war assume that states' actions are the result of the international environment more than domestic factors.

Balance-of-power theories of war argue that war is most likely when there is ________.