Exam 3: Why War
Exam 1: Power and Systems34 Questions
Exam 2: IR Theories32 Questions
Exam 3: Why War38 Questions
Exam 4: Americas Changing National Interests35 Questions
Exam 6: Can the United States Lead the World34 Questions
Exam 7: From Colonialism to Decolonization34 Questions
Exam 8: Eternal Warfare in the Holy Land35 Questions
Exam 9: Oil and Turmoil: The Persian Gulf40 Questions
Exam 10: Trouble and Hope in Latin America37 Questions
Exam 11: Development in Rich and Poor Countries36 Questions
Exam 12: National Security and Insecurity39 Questions
Exam 13: Internal Conflict35 Questions
Exam 14: Asymmetrical Warfare36 Questions
Exam 15: If the Euro Fails, Europe Fails34 Questions
Exam 16: Asia Awakes33 Questions
Exam 17: The United States and Globalization41 Questions
Exam 18: Diplomacy Is Still Alive35 Questions
Exam 19: The Uses of International Law33 Questions
Exam 20: The Reach of the United Nations33 Questions
Exam 21: Finite Few Foodenergywater36 Questions
Select questions type
The Vietnam War taught the United States a valuable lesson previously expressed by Clausewitz: no war will be successful if it has little public support.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
Which of the following is a basic tendency of states according to macro-level analyses of war?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)
Recent research suggests that violence and war come naturally to humans and that their basic instinct is to confront and kill rather than run away.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(36)
Micro-level theories are cast at the individual level of analysis.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)
Which of the following does Huntington say best explains ongoing conflicts between Islam and Christianity?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)
What did American theologian Reinhold Neibuhr call a heresy because it required Christians to do nothing in the face of evil?
a.bellicosity
b.pacifism
c.peace
d.war
e.atheism
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(35)
Are state-level theories of war superior to system-level theories? Is one level adequate to explain war or are both needed? Use examples from specific conflicts to justify your answer.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)
If a state responds to the security dilemma, it will increase its arms and, ultimately, make itself safer.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(47)
Is the current international system legitimate or revolutionary? Provide evidence for whichever position you take. If you choose legitimate, explain why some states that some might perceive as being revolutionary actually may not be; and if you choose revolutionary, provide examples of specific states whose behavior is consistent with that theory.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(42)
How do micro- and macro-level theories of war differ? What levels of analysis do these correspond to? Which level of analysis do you find best?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)
The security dilemma produces at the very least what outcome?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Which of the following is a correct interpretation of the hierarchy-of-power theory?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)
Misperception can cause a state to be perceived as overly (and often unnecessarily) aggressive but not under-aggressive.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)
Who among the following can be considered a leader of a revolutionary world system?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Which of the following is an international system suggested by Henry Kissinger, in which all states accept other states' right to exist?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)
The rising power theory of war is accurate only when there is a territorial dispute involved.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(32)
Showing 21 - 38 of 38
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)