Exam 14: Methods of Transfer and Conveyance in Real Estate
Exam 1: Sources of Real Estate Law93 Questions
Exam 2: Land Interests: Present and Future137 Questions
Exam 3: Extent of Real Estate Interests122 Questions
Exam 4: Nonpossessory Interests in Real Estate100 Questions
Exam 5: Fixtures111 Questions
Exam 6: Liens92 Questions
Exam 7: Describing Land Interests99 Questions
Exam 8: Co-Ownership of Real Estate99 Questions
Exam 9: The Landlord-Tenant Relationship113 Questions
Exam 10: Commercial Leases99 Questions
Exam 11: Real Estate Communities: Multiunit Interests and Owners Associations110 Questions
Exam 12: The Brokers Role in the Transfer of Real Estate142 Questions
Exam 13: The Purchase Contract120 Questions
Exam 14: Methods of Transfer and Conveyance in Real Estate125 Questions
Exam 15: Financing in the Transfer of Real Estate191 Questions
Exam 16: Closing the Deal115 Questions
Exam 17: Transferring Real Estate After Death: Wills, Estates, and Probate131 Questions
Exam 18: Zoning102 Questions
Exam 19: Constitutional Issues in Real Estate114 Questions
Exam 20: Environmental Regulation and Sustainability118 Questions
Exam 21: Legal Issues in Land and Economic Development116 Questions
Exam 22: Tax Aspects of Real Estate Ownership and Transfer98 Questions
Select questions type
Open and notorious possession requires the adverse possessor to give actual notice of possession to the title holder.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
David and Veronica Allen bought land in Independence, Missouri, during 1994 for $22,000. In January 1998, they listed it for sale with a broker, Chuck Zuvers, asking $88,000. The property remained on the market until May 1999, when Thomas C. Scott contracted to buy it for $90,000. Scott signed the sales contract as "Thomas C. Scott, or assigns" because he was organizing Scott, Hewitt & Mize as a limited liability company and wanted the land deeded to the firm.
At closing, and following Scott's instruction, the Allens deeded the property to "Scott, Hewitt & Mize, LLC." Although Scott and his partners had filed articles of organization for Scott, Hewitt & Mize with the Secretary of State before closing, the Secretary of State rejected the articles because of errors contained in them. Scott corrected the errors, and the Secretary of State issued a certificate of organization to Scott, Hewitt & Mize nine days after closing.
-The contract between the Allens and Thomas C. Scott:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
Assume the following sequence of events:
Day 1 - O conveys to A (bfp)
Day 2 - O conveys to B
Day 3 - B records
Day 4 - O conveys to C (bfp)
Day 5 - A records
Day 6 - C records
Under a race notice statute, who has title?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Adams, a successful attorney with many land holdings, executes a deed transferring title to a piece of property to his daughter. The deed is not recorded but is placed in Adams' safe deposit box at the bank. Who has title?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)
An acknowledgement on a deed means that the signatures of the grantor(s) have been notarized.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
David and Veronica Allen bought land in Independence, Missouri, during 1994 for $22,000. In January 1998, they listed it for sale with a broker, Chuck Zuvers, asking $88,000. The property remained on the market until May 1999, when Thomas C. Scott contracted to buy it for $90,000. Scott signed the sales contract as "Thomas C. Scott, or assigns" because he was organizing Scott, Hewitt & Mize as a limited liability company and wanted the land deeded to the firm.
At closing, and following Scott's instruction, the Allens deeded the property to "Scott, Hewitt & Mize, LLC." Although Scott and his partners had filed articles of organization for Scott, Hewitt & Mize with the Secretary of State before closing, the Secretary of State rejected the articles because of errors contained in them. Scott corrected the errors, and the Secretary of State issued a certificate of organization to Scott, Hewitt & Mize nine days after closing.
-A deed contained the language, "I, Jacob Smith, of Washington County, warrant and defend unto Christina Smith ... the following real estate ..." Although the deed included all the necessary requirements, the parties are now unclear as to the type of deed given and what warranties, if any, were given. Which of the following statements is correct?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(31)
The presence of eccentric habits will serve to establish the lack of mental capacity for a deed.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
The tract index allows users to track title through the tract itself and not through transfers.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)
Thelma Gregor says that she recorded her deed on her property in 1945. The city of Fairbanks is unable to locate any evidence of recording, but also notes that a records page that listed recorded deeds is missing from one of the 1945 record books. The original owner of the property has since died. Thelma wants to know if she still owns her property.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
Day 1 - O conveys to A (bfp)
Day 2 - O conveys to B
Day 3 - O conveys to C (bfp)
Day 4 - B records
Day 5 - A records
Day 6 - C records
Under a notice statute, who has title?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(44)
The Kapinskis owned and occupied lot 18 from 1935 to 1950 in a state in which the adverse possession period is 25 years. In 1950, the lot was conveyed to the Wyroskis. The Laurins purchased lot 19 in 1954. The lots were the sites of summer homes. A row of lilac bushes had always marked the boundary between lots 18 and 19, and the Kapinskis and Wyroskis put in and maintained a lawn and flower bed that bordered the lilacs. A boathouse for lot 18 was also located next to the lilac bushes. The boundary line as marked by the lilac bushes was incorrect and the bushes were actually located on the Laurins' lot. The result was that the incorrect boundary expanded the size and boundaries of the Wyroski lot. In 1961, the Laurins bought an action to quiet title.
-With regard to the lilac bushes:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
Summary of transfers and recording:
Day 1 0 → A
Day 2 0 → B (bfp)
Day 3 B records
Day 4 A records
-In a race/notice state, who would take title to the property?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Showing 61 - 80 of 125
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)