Exam 11: Differentiated Schooling, Labor Market Preparation, and Contemporary School Reform: The Postcold

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Typical school reform movements

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(21)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

Many teachers feel alienated from the school reform movement and prefer to remain uninvolved in issues such as school governance. Yet it is argued that correct reform will not occur without the investment of teachers, the people charged with actually implementing change. Why might some teachers choose not to be involved? What reasons might you offer to encourage greater participation? What would it take for you to see yourself as a change agent for school reform?

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(29)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Some teachers may choose not to be involved in the school reform movement for a variety of reasons. They may feel overwhelmed by their workload and lack the time and energy to take on additional responsibilities. They may also feel skeptical about the effectiveness of reform efforts or feel that their input is not valued by school leaders. Additionally, some may fear backlash or negative consequences for speaking out against the status quo.

To encourage greater participation from teachers, it is important to provide them with opportunities for meaningful input and decision-making power in the reform process. Teachers should be reassured that their voices are valued and that their perspectives are crucial for successful implementation of change. It is also important to provide adequate support and resources for teachers to be able to actively participate in reform efforts without feeling overburdened.

As for seeing oneself as a change agent for school reform, it would take a supportive and inclusive school environment where teachers are empowered to take on leadership roles and contribute to decision-making processes. It would also require clear communication and transparency from school leaders about the goals and strategies of the reform movement, as well as opportunities for ongoing professional development and collaboration with colleagues. Ultimately, teachers need to feel that their efforts and contributions to reform are making a meaningful impact on the lives of their students and the overall success of the school.

School choice and vouchers have been touted as a highly democratic solution to the problem of low performing schools, as well as being criticized as fundamentally undemocratic plans that have the potential to harm a larger population of students than they help. Think about this contradiction in terms of the mission of public schooling and its responsibility to society as a whole. On which side of this debate do you find yourself? Explain your position with evidence and reasoned argument.

Free
(Essay)
4.7/5
(29)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

As a student of education, I find myself on the side of the debate that argues for the importance of public schooling and its responsibility to society as a whole. While school choice and vouchers may seem like a democratic solution to the problem of low performing schools, there are several reasons why I believe they are fundamentally undemocratic and have the potential to harm a larger population of students.

First and foremost, public schools have a responsibility to provide equal and equitable education to all students, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background. School choice and vouchers have the potential to further segregate students by allowing more affluent families to opt out of public schools, leaving behind a more disadvantaged and marginalized population. This not only exacerbates existing inequalities in education but also weakens the overall quality of public schooling by draining resources and funding.

Furthermore, public schools are meant to serve as a unifying force in society, bringing together students from diverse backgrounds and fostering a sense of community and citizenship. By promoting school choice and vouchers, we risk fragmenting our educational system and further dividing our society along economic and social lines.

Additionally, research has shown that school choice and vouchers do not necessarily lead to improved academic outcomes. In fact, in some cases, they have been found to have a negative impact on student achievement. This calls into question the effectiveness of these policies in addressing the problem of low performing schools.

In conclusion, while the idea of school choice and vouchers may seem appealing on the surface, I believe that they are ultimately detrimental to the mission of public schooling and its responsibility to society as a whole. Instead of promoting policies that further segregate and weaken our public education system, we should focus on investing in and improving our existing public schools to ensure that all students have access to high-quality education. Education is a public good, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that it serves the needs of all students, not just a select few.

The primary purpose of schooling in our society has often been defined

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

Some defend the idea that schools should prepare students for the world of work, and they lament the decline of vocational and technical education in contemporary schools. This is an issue of particular relevance for schools that do not have significant populations of working- or lower-class students. In your view, does this type of education have a place in our contemporary system? In all educational environments, regardless of student demographics, or in just some? Explain your position using examples and reasoned argument.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(29)

William Bennett recalled Horace Mann's efforts to build universal values and a uniform curriculum when he argued for

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)

A primary ingredient in Jefferson's and Aristotle's regard for liberal education was the relationship between

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)

Just as Massachusetts was a leading state in common school reform in the 1800s, so was it an important state early in the contemporary reform period. Why?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)

The authors appear to take the position that

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)

National school reform movements are generally spurred by the idea that

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

The authors of this volume appear to believe that the ideal of liberal education

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(26)

Think about the perspectives that should be considered in the process of school reform. Who should have a voice? Students? Teachers? Community members? Local school board members? State and/or federal level politicians? What is the level of impact that each of these stakeholders has on the system as we know it? What are the moral, philosophical, and social ramifications of the power, or lack thereof, of each of these voices? Support your perspective with evidence and reasoned argument.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(32)

The authors seem to be skeptical of business-education partnerships because

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(50)

In the authors' view, school choice, vouchers, and charter schools

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(37)

The use of technology in the classroom

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(39)

According to Stan Karp, the adequate yearly progress (AYP) provision of NCLB

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

When Weisberg suggests that vocational educational programs are not well matched to meet the needs of the labor market, he is claiming

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)

In terms of total numbers of new jobs available, the fastest-growing occupations in recent years have been

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

The current collaboration between business and government in educational reform is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)