Exam 7: Agreement Between the Parties
Email is an example of instantaneous communication.
False
According to the postal rule,where the parties contemplate the use of the post as a method of communication,an acceptance is effective as soon as it is posted.Why do you think the courts originally developed this rule? Do you think those reasons are still valid today?
The postal rule was originally developed by the courts to provide a clear and practical solution for determining the moment at which a contract is formed when parties are communicating through the mail. This rule was established at a time when the postal service was the primary method of long-distance communication, and it was necessary to have a standard for determining when an acceptance sent through the post would be considered effective.
The courts likely developed this rule to promote certainty and fairness in contract formation. By establishing that an acceptance is effective as soon as it is posted, the rule provides a clear and objective moment at which a contract is formed, regardless of when the acceptance is actually received by the offeror. This helps to prevent disputes and uncertainty regarding the timing of contract formation, and it also ensures that both parties are bound by the terms of the contract at the same time.
In today's digital age, the reasons for the development of the postal rule may not be as relevant as they once were. With the prevalence of instant communication methods such as email and messaging apps, parties can often communicate and receive acceptances in real-time. However, the postal rule may still be valid in certain situations where parties specifically contemplate the use of the post as a method of communication. In these cases, the rule continues to provide a practical and objective standard for determining the moment at which a contract is formed, promoting certainty and fairness in contract law. Ultimately, the continued validity of the postal rule may depend on the specific circumstances and preferences of the parties involved.
As a general rule,an offer may be directed to the world at large.
In the case of Dickinson v Dodds [1876] 2 Ch D 463,it was held that an offer can be revoked:
If an offer is made by facsimile and no method of acceptance is specified by the offeror,which of the following methods of acceptance would NOT be effective?
In order to reach a legally enforceable agreement,the parties to an agreement:
The decision in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemist (Southern)Limited [1953] 1 QB 401 means that when a customer shops at a supermarket,the offer is accepted and the contract is formed:
In respect to a purported contract an offer made to a person is ineffective if:
For contracts formed online,a business should include a choice of jurisdiction clause.
Describe an option contract's main objective and the requirements for creating one.
Which of the following is NOT a requirement of a valid acceptance to an offer?
Which of the following situations is likely to be seen as an offer rather than as a mere invitation to treat?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)