Exam 17: General and Specific Consumer Protections Under the Acl
In order to establish misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law,3 out of the 4 following elements must be satisfied.Which answer option is NOT a necessary element for establishing misleading and deceptive conduct?
C
Which of the following is NOT one of the guidelines for determining if conduct is misleading and deceptive within the meaning of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law?
B
To what extent have the laws relating to unconscionability undermined the certainty of commercial and consumer contracts?
The laws relating to unconscionability have not undermined the certainty of commercial and consumer contracts to a significant extent. Unconscionability is a legal doctrine that allows courts to invalidate contracts that are found to be excessively one-sided or unfair to one party. While this doctrine may introduce some level of uncertainty into contract law, it ultimately serves to protect parties from entering into agreements that are grossly unfair or oppressive.
In commercial contracts, the doctrine of unconscionability provides a safeguard against exploitation and abuse of power by one party over another. It ensures that contracts are entered into fairly and in good faith, promoting a more equitable and just business environment. While there may be some uncertainty in determining what constitutes unconscionability in each specific case, the overall impact on the certainty of commercial contracts is minimal.
Similarly, in consumer contracts, unconscionability laws protect individuals from being taken advantage of by businesses with greater bargaining power. This helps to maintain consumer confidence and trust in the marketplace, ultimately contributing to the overall stability and certainty of consumer transactions.
Overall, while the doctrine of unconscionability may introduce some level of uncertainty into contract law, its primary purpose is to promote fairness and equity in commercial and consumer contracts. As such, the impact on the certainty of these contracts is relatively minimal in comparison to the important protections it provides for parties with less bargaining power.
Which of the following is NOT a remedy that may be sought by a person affected by a breach of the Australian Consumer Law?
Section 29(1)of the Australian Consumer Law prohibits false representations regarding services relating to:
Conduct that is misleading and deceptive under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law can result in both civil and criminal penalties.
How does s18 of the Australian Consumer Law define 'conduct'?
The statutory prohibition of unconscionable conduct in s 21 of the Australian Consumer Law replaces the common law.
Advertising a product at special prices only to tell the consumer the product is no longer available or is available but at a higher price is known as bait advertising.
In relation to 'conduct' under s 18 of the ACL,Henjo Investments Pty Ltd & Ors v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (1988)79 ALR 83 is authority for the principal that:
Which of the following is NOT a power available to a regulator to enforce the Australian Consumer Law?
Advertising something at a special price and then telling customers that it is unavailable and offering them something else at a higher price is an example of:
Allegations of a breach of a specific unfair practices section of the Australian Consumer Law will often also involve a breach of the general prohibition in s 18 for misleading and deceptive conduct.
Why was the conduct found not to be misleading and deceptive in McWilliam's Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd [1980] ATPR 40-188?
Which of the following is NOT covered by the Australian Consumer Law?
Which of the following statements are true in relation to the liability of manufacturers for defective goods?
Which of the following is a defence to an action for manufacturers liability for defective goods?
Which of the following 'consumers' are NOT protected by s 22 of the unconscionability provisions of the Australian Consumer Law?
Why was the conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in Pacific Dunlop v Hogan (1989)23 FCR 553?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)