Exam 17: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts
Exam 1: The Nature and Sources of Law56 Questions
Exam 2: The Court System and Dispute Resolution57 Questions
Exam 3: Business Ethics, Social Forces, and the Law52 Questions
Exam 4: The Constitution As the Foundation of the Legal Environment57 Questions
Exam 5: Government Regulation of Competition and Prices48 Questions
Exam 6: Administrative Agencies58 Questions
Exam 7: The Legal Environment of International Trade57 Questions
Exam 8: Crimes57 Questions
Exam 9: Torts58 Questions
Exam 10: Intellectual Property Rights52 Questions
Exam 11: Cyberlaw52 Questions
Exam 12: Nature and Classes of Contracts: Contracting on the Internet53 Questions
Exam 13: Formation of Contracts: Offer and Acceptance53 Questions
Exam 14: Capacity and Genuine Assent44 Questions
Exam 15: Consideration49 Questions
Exam 16: Legality and Public Policy48 Questions
Exam 17: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts59 Questions
Exam 18: Third Persons and Contracts51 Questions
Exam 19: Discharge of Contracts57 Questions
Exam 20: Breach of Contract and Remedies58 Questions
Exam 21: Personal Property and Bailments53 Questions
Exam 22: Legal Aspects of Supply Chain Management53 Questions
Exam 23: Nature and Form of Sales53 Questions
Exam 24: Title and Risk of Loss40 Questions
Exam 25: Product Liability: Warranties and Torts53 Questions
Exam 26: Obligations and Performance42 Questions
Exam 27: Remedies for Breach of Sales Contracts53 Questions
Exam 28: Kinds of Instruments, Parties, and Negotiability52 Questions
Exam 29: Transfers of Negotiable Instruments and Warranties of Parties53 Questions
Exam 30: Liability of the Parties Under Negotiable Instruments53 Questions
Exam 31: Checks and Funds Transfers53 Questions
Exam 32: Nature of the Debtor-Creditor Relationship53 Questions
Exam 33: Consumer Protection53 Questions
Exam 34: Secured Transactions in Personal Property52 Questions
Exam 35: Bankruptcy53 Questions
Exam 36: Insurance53 Questions
Exam 37: Agency53 Questions
Exam 38: Third Persons in Agency53 Questions
Exam 39: Regulation of Employment53 Questions
Exam 40: Equal Employment Opportunity Law53 Questions
Exam 41: Types of Business Organizations56 Questions
Exam 42: Partnerships60 Questions
Exam 43: LPs, LLCs, and LLPs47 Questions
Exam 44: Corporate Formation52 Questions
Exam 46: Securities Regulation56 Questions
Exam 47: Accountants Liability and Malpractice51 Questions
Exam 48: Management of Corporations53 Questions
Exam 49: Real Property53 Questions
Exam 50: Environmental Law and Land Use Controls54 Questions
Exam 51: Leases53 Questions
Exam 52: Decedents Estates and Trusts53 Questions
Select questions type
Customs and trade usage can override the express provisions of a contract.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(45)
Jones and Clark entered into a written contract for the purchase of an apartment building by Clark. The contract was carefully drafted to set forth the agreement of the parties. It was signed by both parties. Clark subsequently claimed that the contract did not cover all the terms included in the written and oral agreements that the parties had made during their prior negotiations.
Jones claimed that the parol evidence rule barred proof of all of their prior agreements. Which claim would be upheld in court?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)
In interpreting an ambiguous contract, one part of the contract:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)
Because many oral contracts are legally enforceable, it is a good business practice in the preliminary stages of discussions to stipulate that no binding agreement is intended to be formed until a written contract is prepared and signed by the parties.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(44)
A person who is prevented from enforcing a contract because of the statute of frauds also is prevented from recovering the value of services, property, or money furnished the other party to the oral contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
When an insurance policy is ambiguous, the policy is interpreted:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
An oral agreement to supply a line of credit for two (2) years cannot be enforced because of the statute of frauds.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(35)
Suzy Bartles enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Bartles feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Bartles orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Bartles orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Bartles now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney.
Bartles now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Bartles honor her contractual agreements?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(30)
When the statute of frauds applies and there is no written proof of the contract, the contract is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Bart was a self-made millionaire who had earned his fortune by dedicated hard work. Bart had worked so hard that he never had developed much of a social life. Bart met Linda and fell in love with her. When Bart proposed to Linda, she told him that she needed time before making such an important decision. Pressing her for a favorable response, Bart telephoned Linda and promised her $100,000 if she would marry him. Linda then accepted the proposal.
Bart contracted with Quick Builders for the construction of a home Bart intended to move into with Linda after their marriage. Construction by Quick was not very quick because Quick was not paying subcontractors the sums that they were owed. They, in turn, were not completing their work. To expedite matters, Bart called the subcontractors and assured them that Bart would pay any sums that Quick Builders did not pay if they would complete the construction.
Bart and Linda married and the subcontractors completed the work. Quick Builders did not pay the subcontractors in full. Bart failed to pay Linda the $100,000. Both Linda and the subcontractors sued Bart. Discuss the probable outcome of the lawsuits.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(32)
The writing required by the statute of frauds in the case of a contract for the sale of land must:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
The parol evidence rule prohibits only the use of oral testimony that alters an apparently complete written contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)
Details of performance of a contract not expressly stated in a contract will often be implied by the court.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(29)
Showing 41 - 59 of 59
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)