Exam 17: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Customs and trade usage can override the express provisions of a contract.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(45)

Jones and Clark entered into a written contract for the purchase of an apartment building by Clark. The contract was carefully drafted to set forth the agreement of the parties. It was signed by both parties. Clark subsequently claimed that the contract did not cover all the terms included in the written and oral agreements that the parties had made during their prior negotiations. Jones claimed that the parol evidence rule barred proof of all of their prior agreements. Which claim would be upheld in court?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)

In interpreting an ambiguous contract, one part of the contract:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)

The statute of frauds applies to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

Because many oral contracts are legally enforceable, it is a good business practice in the preliminary stages of discussions to stipulate that no binding agreement is intended to be formed until a written contract is prepared and signed by the parties.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(44)

A person who is prevented from enforcing a contract because of the statute of frauds also is prevented from recovering the value of services, property, or money furnished the other party to the oral contract.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

When an insurance policy is ambiguous, the policy is interpreted:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

An oral agreement to supply a line of credit for two (2) years cannot be enforced because of the statute of frauds.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(35)

A writing required by the statute of frauds may be in any form.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)

Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

Suzy Bartles enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Bartles feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Bartles orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Bartles orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Bartles now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney. Bartles now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Bartles honor her contractual agreements?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(30)

When the statute of frauds applies and there is no written proof of the contract, the contract is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

A contract is interpreted to give effect to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)

Bart was a self-made millionaire who had earned his fortune by dedicated hard work. Bart had worked so hard that he never had developed much of a social life. Bart met Linda and fell in love with her. When Bart proposed to Linda, she told him that she needed time before making such an important decision. Pressing her for a favorable response, Bart telephoned Linda and promised her $100,000 if she would marry him. Linda then accepted the proposal. Bart contracted with Quick Builders for the construction of a home Bart intended to move into with Linda after their marriage. Construction by Quick was not very quick because Quick was not paying subcontractors the sums that they were owed. They, in turn, were not completing their work. To expedite matters, Bart called the subcontractors and assured them that Bart would pay any sums that Quick Builders did not pay if they would complete the construction. Bart and Linda married and the subcontractors completed the work. Quick Builders did not pay the subcontractors in full. Bart failed to pay Linda the $100,000. Both Linda and the subcontractors sued Bart. Discuss the probable outcome of the lawsuits.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(32)

The writing required by the statute of frauds in the case of a contract for the sale of land must:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

The parol evidence rule prohibits only the use of oral testimony that alters an apparently complete written contract.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)

An oral contract to sell a house is binding if:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

Details of performance of a contract not expressly stated in a contract will often be implied by the court.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(29)

The standard statute of frauds:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Showing 41 - 59 of 59
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)