Exam 14: Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Explain the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976.
Mergers may present threats to competition, depending on the type of merger and the size and strength of the companies involved. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 was enacted to allow the Department of Justice (DOJ) to review these mergers before they were completed. This Act requires that notice of intent to merge between companies of a certain size must first be given to the DOJ. This gives the DOJ the opportunity to assess the effects the merger will have on the market, and to make recommendations as to whether the merger should go forward.
An agreement among competitors to divide markets by territory:
C
Describe Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Which covers an oligopoly?
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce and focuses on agreements made to restrain trade.
This language clearly requires at least two participants and has control over oligopolies. Section 2 of the Act prohibits monopolizing or the attempt to monopolize. This section can be applied to a lone participant and focuses on the creation or misuse of monopoly power through wrongful exclusionary means.
Which of the following behaviors is a horizontal per se violation?
All the member countries of the European Commission (EC) can impose criminal as well as civil and injunctive relief against antitrust violations.
Arrangements whereby dealers agree to resell the product only within specified territories and to solicit business only from specified classes of customers are:
Which of the following statements is true for conglomerate mergers?
Two telecom companies in the same market are vertical competitors.
A cement company and a company that supplies sand to the cement manufacturer are _____.
Antitrust is the area of law which keeps the market open by regulating business activities.
A silicon chip manufacturer agreed to purchase computers from a computer firm that buys its silicon chips from the first firm. After the agreement, neither of the two companies bought from outside competitors, thereby closing off the markets of the two firms. This is an example of _____.
When there is an acquisition, _____ means that other firms can no longer deal with the acquired firm.
Which of the following statements is true for per se violations?
Which of the following statements is true for the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914?
State attorneys general are free to litigate on behalf of their state citizens individually.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)