Exam 5: Consumer Welfare and Policy Analysis
The equivalent variation is always less than the consumer's income
True
Ed's utility from vacations (V)and meals (M)is given by the function U(V,M)= V2M.Last year,the price of vacations was $200 and the price of meals was $50.This year,the price of meals rose to $75,the price of vacations remained the same.Both years,Ed had an income of $1500.
a.Calculate the change in consumer surplus from meals resulting from the change in meal prices.
b.What is the compensating variation for the price change in meals?
c.Calculate the equivalent variation for the price change in meals.
a.Ed's optimization problem is
Max V2M
Subject to pMM + 200V = 1500
where pM is the price of meals.Using the Lagrangian,we derive the demand for meals:
M* = 500/pM
The change in consumer surplus is found from the integral:
∆CS = ∫50 75 500/pMdpM = -500 ln(pM)| 50 75 = -500 [ln(75)- ln(50)] = -202.7
So the change in consumer surplus is -$202.7.
b.The CV is the amount of money needed to offset a consumer's harm from a price increase.Ed's utility before the price change is based on his optimal consumption bundle.
M1 = 500/50 = 10
and V1 = 1000/200 = 5.His utility is U(5,10)= 5210 = 250.Now we look at the expenditure function when pM = 75.The Lagrangian is:
L = 75M + 200V + [250 - V2M]
The optimization conditions are:
LM = 75 - V2 = 0
LV = 200 - 2MV = 0
L = 250 - V2M = 0
The first two conditions yield
3/4 = V/M
So V = 3M/4.Plug into the utility function
250 = (3M/4)2M
Solving for M = 7.63.Solve for V = 5.72.The expenditure required to purchase this bundle is:
75M + 200V = 75(7.63)+ 200 (5.72)= 1717.25
Thus the CV is $1,500 - $1,717.25 = $217.25.
c.The EV is the amount of money Ed will pay to prevent the price increase.To find this,we start by finding his utility after the price change with an income of $1500.From above,V = 5 and M = 500/75 = 6.67.His utility from this bundle is U = (5)2(6.67)= 166.75.The Lagrangian to find the expenditure function is:
L = 50M + 200V + [166.75 - V2M]
The optimization conditions are:
LM = 50 - V2 = 0
LV = 200 - 2MV = 0
L = 166.75 - V2M = 0
Solve for the optimal bundle:
M = 8.74,V = 4.37.
The expenditure is:
50(8.74)+ 200(4.37)= 1311.
Ed would pay up to 1500 - 1311 = $189 to avoid the price change.This is the EV.
During droughts,cities often impose water use restrictions on consumers.Suppose a representative consumer has preferences for Water (W)and other goods (X)given by the utility function:
U(W,X)= WX.
Suppose the price of other goods is $1 and the price of water is initially 50¢.The consumer has a budget of $50/week.
a.How much water will the consumer purchase each week?
b.Suppose the government imposes a quota on water use of 50 units/week.Show that the quota reduces the representative consumer's utility.
c.By how much does the quota harm the representative consumer? Specifically,compute the equivalent variation of the quota.
a.The consumer will choose 100 units of water per week.
b.Since the consumer can no longer consumer the optimal bundle from before,she will choose a bundle of 50 units of water (costing $25)and spend $75 on other goods.Her utility before was U(100,50)=5000 and now is U(50,75)= 3750.She is indeed worse off from the quota.
c.We wish to find the amount of income which will lead to a utility of 3750 without a quota.The MRS = MRT condition is X/W = .5/1,or 2X = W.Plugging into the utility function,2X2 = 3750 or X = 43.3.So Y = 86.6.The Expenditure for this bundle of goods is $86.6.Thus the EV is 86.6 - 100 = -13.4.
Suppose a consumer purchases Food (F)and other goods (X)with their income of $100.For simplicity,suppose that food and other goods are measured in $1 units,so the price of each is $1.Currently,the consumer can purchase unlimited food stamps by paying 10¢ for $1 of food.With this,the consumer purchases 500 food stamps (for 500 units of food)and 50 units of X.As a result,the government must pay 90¢ towards food,for a total cost of $450.Using a graph of budget constraints and indifference curves,show that the consumer prefers to receive a cash gift of $450 over the food stamp option.
You pay $15 for an all-you-can-eat buffet.The food isn't so good,but definitely edible.When you finish eating,what is the marginal value of the last bite of food you consumed?
In response to an increase in the wage rate,the income effect will usually cause a person to
If Bobby thinks that leisure is an inferior good,then his labor supply curve
If workers are in the backward-bending section of their labor supply curves,than an increase in the income tax rate will
Mister Jones was selling his house.The asking price was $220,000,and Jones decided he would take no less than $200,000.After some negotiation,Mister Smith purchased the house for $205,000.Smith's consumer surplus is
An increase in unearned income always creates a disincentive to work
Consumer surplus from a given purchase is the difference between what one was willing to pay for that purchase and what was actually paid.
A tax cut that raises the after-tax wage rate will most likely result in more hours worked if
Suppose a person's utility for leisure (L)and consumption (Y)can be expressed as
U = Y + L0.5.Show what happens to the person's labor supply curve when the income tax is cut from 70 % to 30 %.Denote hours worked as H and wage per hour as w.
Mary purchased a stuffed animal toy for $5.After a few weeks,someone offered her $100 for the toy.Mary refused.One can conclude that Mary's consumer surplus from the toy is
Consumers who are more sensitive to changes in price suffer a greater loss of consumer surplus from any given price increase.
Consider a consumer with preferences for consumption of a composite good (C)and leisure (L)given by the following utility function:
U(C,L)= 2C1/2 + L
Denote the consumer's wage rate by w and total time available for labor and leisure is normalized to one.The price of consumption is one.Denote the amount of labor supplied as N,so that
N + L = 1.The consumer also earns non-labor income ("allowance")of 0.
a.Write out the budget constraint determining feasible allocations of leisure and consumption.
b.Compute the optimal bundle of leisure and optimal bundle of consumption.
c.Derive the consumer's labor supply function: N*(w,).
d.Determine the effect of increasing non-labor income on the supply of labor (that is,compute the relevant partial derivative).
e.How does non-labor income affect the consumption of the composite good,C?
f.Compute the effects of an increase in wage on consumption and labor supply.Is leisure a normal good?
A backward-bending labor supply curve could possibly imply which of the following cases?
As the price of a good increases,the loss in consumer surplus is larger,
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)