Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments -$ \begin{array}{l}(\mathrm{A} \cdot \mathrm{B}) \supset \mathrm{C} \\ \sim \underline{\mathrm{A} \vee \sim \mathrm{B}} \\ \therefore \mathrm{C}\end{array} $

A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent C

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments -$ \begin{array}{l}\mathrm{A} \supset(\mathrm{B} \cdot \mathrm{C}) \\ \underline{B \cdot C} \\ \therefore \mathrm{A}\end{array} $

A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method -$ \begin{array}{l}\mathrm{Q} \vee \sim \mathrm{E} \\\underline{ \sim \mathrm{Q}} \\ \therefore \sim \mathrm{E}\end{array} $

The answer of Determine whether the argument is valid or...

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments -$ \begin{array}{l}\mathrm{A} \supset(\mathrm{B} \vee \mathrm{C}) \\ \sim\underline{ \mathrm{B} \cdot \sim \mathrm{C}} \\ \therefore \sim \mathrm{A}\end{array} $

A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent A) modus ponens B) modus tollens C) denying the antecedent D) affirming the consequent

Exam 7: Evaluating Truth-Functional Arguments

Write a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation for each of the following passages. -If the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. Since the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime because Congress demands action, we can count on seeing the stock market rebound.

Free

(Essay)

4.8/5

(39)

Question 1

Correct Answer:

Verified

This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The conclusion is that we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The first premise is that if the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. The second premise is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime.
This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. The premise is that Congress demands action.
This passage is a deductive truth-functional argument. It is invalid because it is the form of denying the antecedent, as is shown in the translation below.
$\begin{array}{l}\sim \mathrm{G} \supset \sim \mathrm{R} \\ \underline{\mathrm{G}} \\ \therefore \mathrm{R}\end{array}$

1. If the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. Since 2. the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime because 3. Congress demands action, 4.we can count on seeing the stock market rebound.
$This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The conclusion is that we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The first premise is that if the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. The second premise is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. The premise is that Congress demands action. This passage is a deductive truth-functional argument. It is invalid because it is the form of denying the antecedent, as is shown in the translation below. \begin{array}{l}\sim \mathrm{G} \supset \sim \mathrm{R} \\ \underline{\mathrm{G}} \\ \therefore \mathrm{R}\end{array} 1. If the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. Since 2. the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime because 3. Congress demands action, 4.we can count on seeing the stock market rebound.$

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by identifying the argument form. -If managers plan to give themselves a raise, then they will either raise the pay of the analysts or they will ask for more money from investors. Therefore, since they neither raised the pay of the analysts nor asked for more money from investors, managers must not be planning to give themselves a raise.

Free

(Essay)

4.8/5

(39)

Question 2

Correct Answer:

Verified

$\begin{array}{l}M \supset(A \vee I) \\ \underline{\sim(A \vee I)} \\ \therefore \sim M\end{array}$

modus tollens; valid

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - (\cdot)\supset \sim \therefore

Free

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(33)

Question 3

Correct Answer:

Verified

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method. -Can you believe what is now going on in the art world? If either the art historians are not correct or the artists are not progressive, then retro art is not just a fad. Therefore, neither the art historians or the critics are correct, since Dada is boring and retro art is just a fad.

(Essay)

4.8/5

(33)

Question 4

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Truth Table Method. - A\vee(B\supsetC)

(Essay)

4.9/5

(31)

Question 5

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -Phyllis will be late for the exam if she swims with the team and lifts weights with her friend.

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(39)

Question 6

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Truth Table Method. -Since we planned to go to either Egypt or Thailand this summer, it's clear that we will be traveling to Thailand. Isn't it still dangerous to travel to Egypt right now?

(Essay)

4.9/5

(39)

Question 7

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by identifying the argument form. -The death penalty will deter terrorists only if it deters murderers. Consequently, the death penalty will not deter terrorists since it has been shown to not deter murderers.

(Essay)

4.9/5

(36)

Question 8

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method. -If Egypt's elected leader is not both dictatorial and intolerant, then he is not obstructing democratic reforms. Due to the fact that he is not obstructing democratic reforms, Egypt's elected leader is not dictatorial.

(Essay)

4.7/5

(37)

Question 9

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Truth Table Method. -Either Lady Gaga will win the award for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance or she will win Best New Artist. And she will win Best Female Pop Vocal Performance if she wins Best New Artist. Therefore, Lady Gaga will win both awards.

(Essay)

4.9/5

(34)

Question 10

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by identifying the argument form. -Peter Singer argues that meat consumption is unethical, and he's right. This is because meat consumption is ethical only if animals are treated humanely, and our current food industry does not treat animals humanely.

(Essay)

4.8/5

(38)

Question 11

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -If you are eligible for swimming, then you are eligible for water polo.

(Multiple Choice)

4.9/5

(41)

Question 12

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - \supset(\cdot) \therefore

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(32)

Question 13

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method - \vee\sim \therefore\sim

(Essay)

5.0/5

(27)

Question 14

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -Either kestrels winter in Mexico and summer in Canada, or they remain all year here in Alabama.

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(41)

Question 15

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method. -Charles is not cheating and Vincent is deceptive, only if Hank is not aggressive. Now, if Bradley is trustworthy, then Charles is not cheating. Thus, since either Hank is aggressive or Charles is cheating, it's not the case that both Hank is aggressive and Bradley is trustworthy.

(Essay)

4.9/5

(30)

Question 16

Translate each of the following arguments into symbolic form. Then, determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by identifying the argument form. -The war on drugs will succeed in the 1990's if Prohibition succeeded in the 1920's. But Prohibition did not succeed in the 1920's. So, the war on drugs will not succeed in the 1990's.

(Essay)

4.8/5

(30)

Question 17

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -You cannot enter the chess tournament unless you are ranked.

(Multiple Choice)

4.8/5

(35)

Question 18

Write a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation for each of the following passages. -How can you accuse the police chief of bias since he has never treated someone unfairly?

(Essay)

4.7/5

(25)

Question 19

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - \supset(\vee) \sim \therefore\sim

(Multiple Choice)

4.7/5

(32)

Question 20

Showing 1 - 20 of 35

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - (\cdot)\supset \sim \therefore

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Truth Table Method. - A\vee(B\supsetC)

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -Phyllis will be late for the exam if she swims with the team and lifts weights with her friend.

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -If you are eligible for swimming, then you are eligible for water polo.

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - \supset(\cdot) \therefore

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid by using the Shortcut Method - \vee\sim \therefore\sim

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -Either kestrels winter in Mexico and summer in Canada, or they remain all year here in Alabama.

Choose the correct translation for each of the following compound claims. -You cannot enter the chess tournament unless you are ranked.

Write a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation for each of the following passages. -How can you accuse the police chief of bias since he has never treated someone unfairly?

Identify the argument form for each of the following symbolized arguments - \supset(\vee) \sim \therefore\sim

Recognizing Arguments

Analyzing Arguments

Diagramming Arguments

Detecting Fallacies

Preparing to Evaluate Arguments

Evaluating Categorical Arguments

Evaluating Analogical Arguments

Evaluating Inductive Generalizations

Evaluating Causal Arguments

Filters