Exam 21: Introduction to Sales and Lease Contracts
Exam 1: An Introduction to Dynamic Business Law67 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics67 Questions
Exam 3: The US Legal System80 Questions
Exam 4: Alternative Dispute Resolution66 Questions
Exam 5: Constitutional Principles67 Questions
Exam 6: International and Comparative Law67 Questions
Exam 7: Crime and the Business Community79 Questions
Exam 8: Tort Law66 Questions
Exam 9: Negligence and Strict Liability71 Questions
Exam 10: Product Liability67 Questions
Exam 11: Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals67 Questions
Exam 12: Intellectual Property66 Questions
Exam 13: Introduction to Contracts71 Questions
Exam 14: Agreement66 Questions
Exam 15: Consideration64 Questions
Exam 16: Capacity and Legality66 Questions
Exam 17: Legal Assent67 Questions
Exam 18: Contracts in Writing65 Questions
Exam 19: Third-Party Rights to Contracts68 Questions
Exam 20: Discharge and Remedies66 Questions
Exam 21: Introduction to Sales and Lease Contracts65 Questions
Exam 22: Title, Risk of Loss, and Insurable Interest65 Questions
Exam 23: Performance and Obligations Under Sales and Leases65 Questions
Exam 24: Remedies for Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts66 Questions
Exam 25: Warranties65 Questions
Exam 26: Negotiable Instruments: Negotiability and Transferability66 Questions
Exam 27: Negotiation, Holder in Due Course, and Defenses69 Questions
Exam 28: Liability, Defenses, and Discharge67 Questions
Exam 29: Checks and Electronic Fund Transfers69 Questions
Exam 30: Secured Transactions65 Questions
Exam 31: Other Creditors Remedies and Suretyship65 Questions
Exam 32: Bankruptcy and Reorganization67 Questions
Exam 33: Agency Formation and Duties65 Questions
Exam 34: Liability to Third Parties and Termination65 Questions
Exam 35: Forms of Business Organization65 Questions
Exam 36: Partnerships: Nature, Formation, and Operation65 Questions
Exam 37: Partnerships: Termination and Limited Partnerships65 Questions
Exam 38: Corporations: Formation and Financing67 Questions
Exam 40: Corporations: Mergers, Consolidations, Terminations65 Questions
Exam 41: Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection67 Questions
Exam 42: Employment and Labor Law65 Questions
Exam 43: Employment Discrimination65 Questions
Exam 44: Administrative Law67 Questions
Exam 45: Consumer Law64 Questions
Exam 46: Environmental Law65 Questions
Exam 47: Antitrust Law65 Questions
Exam 48: The Nature of Property, Personal Property, and Bailments65 Questions
Exam 49: Real Property66 Questions
Exam 50: Landlord-Tenant Law65 Questions
Exam 51: Insurance Law65 Questions
Exam 52: Wills and Trusts64 Questions
Select questions type
Which of the following is true regarding the sources of laws that interpret sales contracts?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Which of the following is true regarding payment and the place for delivery if those terms are left open under the UCC?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
Under the UCC contracts for the sale of goods must be in writing in order to be enforceable if they are valued at ______ or more.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Which of the following is false regarding the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods ("CISG")?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Federal law is the primary method by which to interpret sales contracts.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)
"Customer Uncertainty." Wallace wanted baseball caps with the name of the firm of which he was president, ABC Corporation, emblazoned on the front. Fran, a merchant in specialized goods, orally agreed with Wallace that she would sell to him 200 baseball caps at $5 each. No writing was ever made although there were a number of witnesses to the conversation. After the caps were finished, but before they were shipped, Wallace called to cancel the order because his firm had just announced a merger and would no longer be known as ABC Corporation. Fran told him to forget canceling the contract because she had just finished the caps. Wallace told Fran that she should have been smarter and had him sign something because without a writing, she does not have a chance in court. Fran is also having problems with other customers. A father who voluntarily coached a youth softball league in his community called and orally ordered 150 baseball caps at a cost of $400 each to give out at a league banquet. He just wanted a variety of caps with no name on them because players from different teams would be at the banquet. Fran had sent a confirming letter to the coach. Fran had the caps packed up and ready to go. Twenty days later, just before she shipped them, the coach called and told her that there was a big feud, the banquet was canceled, and that he was canceling the order. She believes that the coach should pay damages and that it is just that he do so because a big order was involved. Finally, Fran plans on taking to small claims court a merchant customer who orally ordered 500 plain T-shirts at a cost of $5 each but has not picked them up and has refused to do so after several demands.
-Which of the following is true regarding Fran's assertion that she should be allowed to recover from the coach?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Contrast the requirement of consideration for modification of contracts under the common law and under the UCC.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(34)
Under the UCC lease contracts that require payments of ______ or more must be in writing in order to be enforceable.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Which of the following is true regarding the holding of the court in The Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Hellmuth Obata & Kassabaum Inc., v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Limited, the case in the text involving whether the statute of frauds barred enforcement of a contract and also whether the United Nations Convention on Contracts of the International Sale of Goods (CISG) applied to a contract in view of the fact that a particular state's law was referenced in the contract?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
"Customer Uncertainty." Wallace wanted baseball caps with the name of the firm of which he was president, ABC Corporation, emblazoned on the front. Fran, a merchant in specialized goods, orally agreed with Wallace that she would sell to him 200 baseball caps at $5 each. No writing was ever made although there were a number of witnesses to the conversation. After the caps were finished, but before they were shipped, Wallace called to cancel the order because his firm had just announced a merger and would no longer be known as ABC Corporation. Fran told him to forget canceling the contract because she had just finished the caps. Wallace told Fran that she should have been smarter and had him sign something because without a writing, she does not have a chance in court. Fran is also having problems with other customers. A father who voluntarily coached a youth softball league in his community called and orally ordered 150 baseball caps at a cost of $400 each to give out at a league banquet. He just wanted a variety of caps with no name on them because players from different teams would be at the banquet. Fran had sent a confirming letter to the coach. Fran had the caps packed up and ready to go. Twenty days later, just before she shipped them, the coach called and told her that there was a big feud, the banquet was canceled, and that he was canceling the order. She believes that the coach should pay damages and that it is just that he do so because a big order was involved. Finally, Fran plans on taking to small claims court a merchant customer who orally ordered 500 plain T-shirts at a cost of $5 each but has not picked them up and has refused to do so after several demands.
-Are there any steps Fran should take in small claims court, or before she goes, regarding the customer who ordered the plain T-shirts?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
"Carpet Woes." Beau went shopping at ABC Carpet. He saw some carpet he liked but could not make up his mind. The manager at ABC Carpet wrote down the proposed purchase price for him along with a statement that the price would be good for three months. Two months later Beau went back to ABC Carpet to purchase the carpet. Unfortunately, the price had gone up. Beau showed the manager his writing and guaranteed price, but the manager said that the offer was no longer good. Although he had to pay more than the ABC manager had initially promised, Beau proceeded to purchase his carpet from XYZ carpet, and he also contracted with XYZ to do the installation. Unfortunately, Beau almost immediately started to have problems with the carpet. Beau told the sales manager for XYZ Carpet that he was planning on bring suit for breach of warranty. The sales manager, however, told him that breach of warranty provisions only applied to sales of goods and that the carpet purchase was for installation, a service.
-Which of the following is true in most states regarding whether the UCC applies to the contract Beau had with XYZ Carpet?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(26)
Regarding the "Case Opener," which of the following best represents the decision on whether the cell towers at issue constituted goods?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
When courts interpret sales and lease contracts, how do they prioritize express terms, course of performance, course of dealing, and usage of trade?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
Which of the following articles of the UCC governs sales contracts?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(44)
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)