Exam 8: Tort Law
Exam 1: An Introduction to Dynamic Business Law67 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics67 Questions
Exam 3: The US Legal System80 Questions
Exam 4: Alternative Dispute Resolution66 Questions
Exam 5: Constitutional Principles67 Questions
Exam 6: International and Comparative Law67 Questions
Exam 7: Crime and the Business Community79 Questions
Exam 8: Tort Law66 Questions
Exam 9: Negligence and Strict Liability71 Questions
Exam 10: Product Liability67 Questions
Exam 11: Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals67 Questions
Exam 12: Intellectual Property66 Questions
Exam 13: Introduction to Contracts71 Questions
Exam 14: Agreement66 Questions
Exam 15: Consideration64 Questions
Exam 16: Capacity and Legality66 Questions
Exam 17: Legal Assent67 Questions
Exam 18: Contracts in Writing65 Questions
Exam 19: Third-Party Rights to Contracts68 Questions
Exam 20: Discharge and Remedies66 Questions
Exam 21: Introduction to Sales and Lease Contracts65 Questions
Exam 22: Title, Risk of Loss, and Insurable Interest65 Questions
Exam 23: Performance and Obligations Under Sales and Leases65 Questions
Exam 24: Remedies for Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts66 Questions
Exam 25: Warranties65 Questions
Exam 26: Negotiable Instruments: Negotiability and Transferability66 Questions
Exam 27: Negotiation, Holder in Due Course, and Defenses69 Questions
Exam 28: Liability, Defenses, and Discharge67 Questions
Exam 29: Checks and Electronic Fund Transfers69 Questions
Exam 30: Secured Transactions65 Questions
Exam 31: Other Creditors Remedies and Suretyship65 Questions
Exam 32: Bankruptcy and Reorganization67 Questions
Exam 33: Agency Formation and Duties65 Questions
Exam 34: Liability to Third Parties and Termination65 Questions
Exam 35: Forms of Business Organization65 Questions
Exam 36: Partnerships: Nature, Formation, and Operation65 Questions
Exam 37: Partnerships: Termination and Limited Partnerships65 Questions
Exam 38: Corporations: Formation and Financing67 Questions
Exam 40: Corporations: Mergers, Consolidations, Terminations65 Questions
Exam 41: Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection67 Questions
Exam 42: Employment and Labor Law65 Questions
Exam 43: Employment Discrimination65 Questions
Exam 44: Administrative Law67 Questions
Exam 45: Consumer Law64 Questions
Exam 46: Environmental Law65 Questions
Exam 47: Antitrust Law65 Questions
Exam 48: The Nature of Property, Personal Property, and Bailments65 Questions
Exam 49: Real Property66 Questions
Exam 50: Landlord-Tenant Law65 Questions
Exam 51: Insurance Law65 Questions
Exam 52: Wills and Trusts64 Questions
Select questions type
___________ damages are damages awarded to punish the defendant and to deter others from similar conduct.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
"Pet Police." Millie breeds German Shepherd dogs. Bernard, who lives down the street, took in a stray dog loosely identified as a Corgi-plus. The dog, Casanova, would definitely be classified as a mixed breed. Bernard allowed Casanova to roam freely. Unfortunately, Casanova went to visit Millie's pure-bred German Shepherd. Puppies resulted which were Shepherd and Corgi-plus puppies. Millie was incensed. She started a campaign to round up all of the stray dogs, including Casanova, and haul them off to the animal shelter. She picked up a few cats as well. She posted signs all over the neighborhood saying that no animal, neither dog, cat, nor fowl, should come into her yard and that she was going to begin shooting the next time, period. Understandably, Bernard and some of the other neighbors took offense. Bernard comes to Millie's house while she is working in the yard. He walks behind her and shoves her. Millie did not see him coming. Millie turned around and proceeded to have a heated conversation with Bernard. Millie drew her fist back and told Bernard that she was going to punch him in the nose. Millie raised back her arm and started to punch Bernard but he stepped back, and all she managed to do was jab him in the shoulder, causing no actual pain. Sally, who was going by on the street, saw Millie attempting to hit Bernard. Sally came over and grabbed Millie's hands, pinning Millie's hands behind her back.
-Millie's action in jabbing Bernard after she missed his nose, constitutes which of the following?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
A person who commits a tort is often referred to as a ___________.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
"Pet Police." Millie breeds German Shepherd dogs. Bernard, who lives down the street, took in a stray dog loosely identified as a Corgi-plus. The dog, Casanova, would definitely be classified as a mixed breed. Bernard allowed Casanova to roam freely. Unfortunately, Casanova went to visit Millie's pure-bred German Shepherd. Puppies resulted which were Shepherd and Corgi-plus puppies. Millie was incensed. She started a campaign to round up all of the stray dogs, including Casanova, and haul them off to the animal shelter. She picked up a few cats as well. She posted signs all over the neighborhood saying that no animal, neither dog, cat, nor fowl, should come into her yard and that she was going to begin shooting the next time, period. Understandably, Bernard and some of the other neighbors took offense. Bernard comes to Millie's house while she is working in the yard. He walks behind her and shoves her. Millie did not see him coming. Millie turned around and proceeded to have a heated conversation with Bernard. Millie drew her fist back and told Bernard that she was going to punch him in the nose. Millie raised back her arm and started to punch Bernard but he stepped back, and all she managed to do was jab him in the shoulder, causing no actual pain. Sally, who was going by on the street, saw Millie attempting to hit Bernard. Sally came over and grabbed Millie's hands, pinning Millie's hands behind her back.
-Considering Bernard's shoving of Millie in the back, which of the following is true?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(28)
"Hair Stylist Woes." Maryann, a college student, went to see her hair stylist, Candy. Maryann who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Candy told her that she could make that change, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Candy made the change, but Maryann did not do the upkeep required. She also falsely claimed that Candy did not do what Maryann asked her to do, that Candy lied to her, and that Candy was professionally incompetent. Maryann made the statements to friends of hers. She also wrote an editorial in her college newspaper to the effect that Candy's shop should be avoided at all costs because Candy was incompetent. In fact, Candy was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Maryann started her criticism. Candy threatened to sue Maryann for defamation, but Maryann told Candy that Candy could not prevail because Candy could not prove loss of income. Candy had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked and she could do no more business.
-Statements made by Maryann to her friends that were defamatory of Candy are what type of defamation?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(38)
"Hair Stylist Woes." Maryann, a college student, went to see her hair stylist, Candy. Maryann who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Candy told her that she could make that change, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Candy made the change, but Maryann did not do the upkeep required. She also falsely claimed that Candy did not do what Maryann asked her to do, that Candy lied to her, and that Candy was professionally incompetent. Maryann made the statements to friends of hers. She also wrote an editorial in her college newspaper to the effect that Candy's shop should be avoided at all costs because Candy was incompetent. In fact, Candy was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Maryann started her criticism. Candy threatened to sue Maryann for defamation, but Maryann told Candy that Candy could not prevail because Candy could not prove loss of income. Candy had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked and she could do no more business.
-As far as the editorial is concerned, which of the following is true in regards to Maryann's statement that Candy cannot recover because she cannot show loss of income?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)
Showing 61 - 66 of 66
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)