Multiple Choice
What was the result in Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v.Dolinski,in which the plaintiff became ill after consuming a soft drink with a dead mouse in it and sued the manufacturer of the drink?
A) The defendant won because the plaintiff could not explain how the mouse got in the drink.
B) The defendant won because it had been as careful as possible in bottling the drink.
C) The defendant won because the plaintiff's drink was the only drink in the applicable lot or batch that was defective.
D) The plaintiff won because he could prove negligence on the part of the defendant.
E) The plaintiff won because the defendant was held liable under the doctrine of strict liability in tort.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: A defect in design can support a
Q21: Should a plaintiff exposed to the secondhand
Q22: For a warranty to qualify as a
Q23: The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires that sellers
Q24: Most states have statutes of limitations that
Q26: Strict liability is:<br>A) conditional liability.<br>B) comparative liability.<br>C)
Q27: Should the size of a package amount
Q28: In evaluating the adequacy of a product's
Q29: Strict liability has made negligence far less
Q30: Worldwide Toys sells a game in which