Should a Plaintiff Exposed to the Secondhand Smoke of His

Essay

Should a plaintiff exposed to the secondhand smoke of his parents while the plaintiff was a child be able to recover from cigarette manufacturers for smoking-related illness or health problems? Are there variables that should affect the manufacturers' liability? Should such a party be more or less able to recover than the parent for the parent's own smoking-related health problems? What effect should the warnings on cigarette packages have on the outcome?