Multiple Choice
In 2013,Khalid was in an automobile accident and suffered physical injuries.The accident was caused by Rashad's negligence.Khalid threatened to file a lawsuit against Amber Trucking Company,Rashad's employer,claiming $50,000 for pain and suffering,$90,000 for loss of income,and $70,000 in punitive damages.Amber's insurance company will not pay punitive damages; therefore,Amber has offered to settle the case for $100,000 for pain and suffering,$90,000 for loss of income,and nothing for punitive damages.Khalid is in the 35% marginal tax bracket.What is the after-tax difference to Khalid between Khalid's original claim and Amber's offer?
A) Amber's offer is $20,000 less.($50,000 + $90,000 + $70,000 - $100,000 - $90,000) .
B) Amber's offer is $7,000 less.[($50,000 + $90,000 + $70,000 - $100,000 - $90,000) ´ .35) ].
C) Amber's offer is $4,500 more.{$190,000 - ($50,000 + $90,000) + [$70,000 ´ (1 - .35) ]}.
D) Amber's offer is $22,000 more.[($190,000 - $210,000) + ($120,000 ´ .35) ].
E) None of the above.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Rick and Carol Ryan, married taxpayers, took
Q24: In terms of the tax formula applicable
Q50: Many taxpayers who previously itemized will start
Q106: Which, if any, of the statements regarding
Q139: Barbara was injured in an automobile accident.She
Q141: Linda,who has AGI of $120,000 in 2013,contributes
Q143: Wilma,age 70 and single,is claimed as a
Q145: In 2006,Ross,who is single,purchased a personal residence
Q147: During 2013,Esther had the following transactions: <img
Q148: Jason and Peg are married and file