Solved

According to the Supreme Court in Mapp V

Question 6

True/False

According to the Supreme Court in Mapp v.Ohio,leaving the Fourth Amendment's protection from illegal
searches and seizures to solutions other than the exclusionary rule had been effective.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q1: The_justification stems from an ancient legal saying,"There's

Q2: The ethical exception says that illegally obtained

Q3: What is another term used to describe

Q4: Bad evidence is the term used to

Q7: Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence

Q8: In Herring v.U.S.(2009)the court held that if

Q9: The dissent in Herring v.U.S.(2009)argued that the

Q11: The Supreme Court has specifically rejected the

Q32: The _-_ exception to the exclusionary rule

Q42: Weeks v. U.S. gave birth to the