Solved

In Herring V

Question 8

True/False

In Herring v.U.S.(2009)the court held that if an officer makes an arrest,reasonably (but wrongly)believing there's an outstanding arrest warrant against the suspect,the arrest violates the Fourth Amendment but evidence obtained during a search incident to the unlawful arrest is admissible in court.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q3: What is another term used to describe

Q4: Bad evidence is the term used to

Q6: According to the Supreme Court in Mapp

Q7: Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence

Q9: The dissent in Herring v.U.S.(2009)argued that the

Q11: The Supreme Court has specifically rejected the

Q12: According to the Supreme Court,the good faith

Q13: According to the dissent in Mapp v.Ohio

Q32: The _-_ exception to the exclusionary rule

Q42: Weeks v. U.S. gave birth to the