menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Criminal Justice
  3. Study Set
    Criminal Procedure Law and Practice
  4. Exam
    Exam 8: Vehicle Stops, Searches, and Inventories
  5. Question
    In Robbins V
Solved

In Robbins V

Question 7

Question 7

Short Answer

In Robbins v.California (1981),the U.S.Supreme Court stated five considerations that justified the "________ exception" to the warrant requirement.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q2: A valid stop does not _give officers

Q3: A warrant is never needed for use

Q4: A driver of a vehicle has been

Q5: In Michigan Dept.of State Police v.Sitz,the U.S.Supreme

Q6: The U.S.Supreme Court has held that although

Q8: Officer Smith may search the motor home

Q9: After a valid stop,the officer may seize

Q10: The Court has held that a police

Q11: In Maryland v.Dyson (1999),the Court stated that

Q12: A stop of a motor vehicle for

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines