Solved

The Court Has Held That a Police Officer Does Not

Question 10

True/False

The Court has held that a police officer does not need to inform the defendant first that he or she is free to go for a consent to search to be valid.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q5: In Michigan Dept.of State Police v.Sitz,the U.S.Supreme

Q6: The U.S.Supreme Court has held that although

Q7: In Robbins v.California (1981),the U.S.Supreme Court stated

Q8: Officer Smith may search the motor home

Q9: After a valid stop,the officer may seize

Q11: In Maryland v.Dyson (1999),the Court stated that

Q12: A stop of a motor vehicle for

Q13: _are an exception to the rule that

Q14: A vehicle stop is a type of

Q15: After a valid traffic stop,an officer sees