Multiple Choice
The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in this conduct?
B) Given this particular injury to the plaintiff,was it foreseeable that the defendant was the cause?
C) Should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that the defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
D) Was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
E) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Powdersurf is a manufacturer of snowboards.Powdersurf is
Q28: The doctrine that is applied when a
Q30: Intent is required for a product disparagement
Q33: Mary,a 68-year-old widow,hired an electrician to make
Q34: In all defamation of character cases,the plaintiff
Q35: In the Palsgraf case,foreseeability was an issue.The
Q36: A reporter appears on television and declares
Q64: Strict liability is liability without fault.
Q114: True statements can be the basis for
Q127: Good Samaritan laws do not generally protect