Multiple Choice
Mary,a 68-year-old widow,hired an electrician to make some wiring repairs to her home.The electrician accidentally started a fire that destroyed her house.Mary was not injured,but watched her house burn along with all her possessions.It was emotionally devastating to watch as she lost a whole life's worth of memories.Can she recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress?
A) Yes,because the electrician was the cause of her emotional distress through his outrageous conduct of starting the fire.
B) Yes,because her distress was genuine.
C) No,because her situation does not meet all the elements necessary to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
D) No,because she assumed the risk by having someone do electrical work in her home.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: The doctrine that is applied when a
Q30: Intent is required for a product disparagement
Q31: The best statement of the test applied
Q34: In all defamation of character cases,the plaintiff
Q35: In the Palsgraf case,foreseeability was an issue.The
Q36: A reporter appears on television and declares
Q37: Persons who engage in abnormally dangerous activities
Q38: Sam is a business executive who flies
Q114: True statements can be the basis for
Q127: Good Samaritan laws do not generally protect