Multiple Choice
Wikipedia should be treated with caution as a secondary source of legal materials because:
A) It is open to anonymous editing so that the reader cannot be sure about the reliability of the material.
B) Conducting legal research online is generally considered to be inappropriate.
C) The use of free materials is unfair to legal publishers.
D) Wikipedia is widely acknowledged as biased and out-of-date.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q75: If a statute was passed by the
Q82: Which of the following is not a
Q90: To locate a case law authority:<br>A)We refer
Q91: Which of the following is the best
Q92: The 'enacting words' to an Act of
Q93: A 'law report' is:<br>A)An article published by
Q94: An Act passed by the Victorian Parliament
Q95: Legislation is often difficult to draft precisely
Q96: 'Primary legal materials' are:<br>A)The most important and
Q99: Obiter dicta of a higher court can