According to the Supreme Court in District Attorney's Office for the Third

Multiple Choice

According to the Supreme Court in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne (2009) involving prisoner Osborne's post-conviction request to compel officials to release biological evidence so it could be submitted to DNA testing:

A) Osborne has a right under the U.S. Constitution of access to forensic evidence
B) Osborne's rights under Alaska law were violated
C) there is no right under the U.S. Constitution of access to forensic evidence
D) DNA testing is too expensive to make it a constitutional right