Services
Discover
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Psychology
Study Set
The Psychologist
Exam 11: Designing, Conducting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Experiments With More Than Two Groups
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Question 61
Essay
Describe in your own words self-discrepancy theory.
Question 62
Essay
In the following study, participants were randomly assigned to receive humanistic therapy, psychodynamic therapy, or behavioral therapy for their depression. Six months after therapy ended, participants' levels of depression were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all depressed) to 15 (extremely depressed).
GROUP
N
MEAN
STD DEV
STD ERROR
1 (humanistic)
10
5.40
2.17
0.69
2 (psychodynamic)
10
7.50
2.84
0.90
3 (behavioral)
10
5.60
3.13
0.99
\begin{array}{lcccc}{\text { GROUP }} & \text { N } & \text { MEAN } & \text { STD DEV } & \text { STD ERROR } \\\text { 1 (humanistic) } & 10 & 5.40 & 2.17 & 0.69 \\\text { 2 (psychodynamic) } & 10 & 7.50 & 2.84 & 0.90 \\\text { 3 (behavioral) } & 10 & 5.60 & 3.13 & 0.99\end{array}
GROUP
1 (humanistic)
2 (psychodynamic)
3 (behavioral)
N
10
10
10
MEAN
5.40
7.50
5.60
STD DEV
2.17
2.84
3.13
STD ERROR
0.69
0.90
0.99
ONEWAY ANOVA: THERAPY bY DEPRESSION
SUM OF
MEAN
SOURCE
SQUARES
DF
SQUARES
F RATIO
PROB.
BETWEEN GROUPS
26.87
2
13.73
1.78
.
187
WTHIN GROUPS
203.30
27
7.53
TOTAL
230.17
29
\begin{array} { l c c c c c } & \text { SUM OF } & & \text { MEAN } & & \\ \text { SOURCE } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { DF } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { F RATIO } & \text { PROB. } \\ & & & & & \\ \text { BETWEEN GROUPS } & 26.87 & 2 & 13.73 & 1.78 & .187 \\ \text { WTHIN GROUPS } & 203.30 & 27 & 7.53 & & \\ \text { TOTAL } & 230.17 & 29 & & & \end{array}
SOURCE
BETWEEN GROUPS
WTHIN GROUPS
TOTAL
SUM OF
SQUARES
26.87
203.30
230.17
DF
2
27
29
MEAN
SQUARES
13.73
7.53
F RATIO
1.78
PROB.
.187
POST HOC TEST: Tukey-HSD with significance level .05 * Indicates significant differences shown for pairings
G
G
G
r
r
r
p
p
p
1
2
3
\begin{array}{lll}G & G & G \\r & r & r \\p & p & p \\1 & 2 & 3\end{array}
G
r
p
1
G
r
p
2
G
r
p
3
Mean
THERAPY
5.40
Grp 1
7.50
Grp 2
5.60
Grp 3
\begin{array}{ll}\text { Mean}& \text { THERAPY }\\5.40 & \text { Grp 1 } \\7.50 & \text { Grp 2 } \\5.60 & \text { Grp 3 }\end{array}
Mean
5.40
7.50
5.60
THERAPY
Grp 1
Grp 2
Grp 3
-Is this a two-group design or a multiple-group design? How do you know?
Question 63
Multiple Choice
Questions refer to Table 11-2. In this study, 10 children completed a survey regarding their impressions of smokers at age 8 and then again at age 10 and 12. Scores could range from 1 (extreme negative impression of smokers) to 20 (extreme positive impression of smokers) . Table 11-2
GROUP
N
MEAN
STD DEV
STD ERROR
1
(AGE 8)
10
9.70
5.89
1.86
2
(AGE 10)
10
10.40
5.58
1.76
3
(AGE 12)
10
11.80
5.94
1.88
\begin{array} { c c c c c } \text { GROUP } & \mathrm { N } & \text { MEAN } & \text { STD DEV } & \text { STD ERROR } \\ 1 \text { (AGE 8) } & 10 & 9.70 & 5.89 & 1.86 \\ 2 \text { (AGE 10) } & 10 & 10.40 & 5.58 & 1.76 \\ 3 \text { (AGE 12) } & 10 & 11.80 & 5.94 & 1.88 \end{array}
GROUP
1
(AGE 8)
2
(AGE 10)
3
(AGE 12)
N
10
10
10
MEAN
9.70
10.40
11.80
STD DEV
5.89
5.58
5.94
STD ERROR
1.86
1.76
1.88
ONEWAY ANOVA: SMOKING by AGE (CORR SAMP)
SUM OF
MEAN
SOURCE
SQUARES
DF
SQUARES
F RATIO
PROB.
AGE
22.87
2
11.43
6.76
.
006
SUBJECTS
879.63
9
97.74
34.71
.
000
WITHIN CELLS
30.47
18
1.69
TOTAL
932.97
29
\begin{array} { l c c c r r } & \text { SUM OF } & \text { MEAN } & & \\ \text { SOURCE } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { DF } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { F RATIO } & \text { PROB. } \\ \text { AGE } & 22.87 & 2 & 11.43 & 6.76 & .006 \\\text { SUBJECTS } & 879.63 & 9 & 97.74 & 34.71 & .000 \\\text { WITHIN CELLS } & 30.47 & 18 & 1.69 & & \\\text { TOTAL } & 932.97 & 29 & & & \end{array}
SOURCE
AGE
SUBJECTS
WITHIN CELLS
TOTAL
SUM OF
SQUARES
22.87
879.63
30.47
932.97
MEAN
DF
2
9
18
29
SQUARES
11.43
97.74
1.69
F RATIO
6.76
34.71
PROB.
.006
.000
POST HOC TEST: Tukey-HSD with significance level .05 * Indicates significant differences shown for pairings
G
G
G
r
r
r
p
p
p
1
2
3
\begin{array} { l l l } \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } \\ \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } \\ \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \end{array}
G
r
p
1
G
r
p
2
G
r
p
3
Mean
A
G
E
9.70
Grp
1
10.40
Grp 2
11.80
Grp
3
\begin{array}{ll}\text { Mean } & \mathrm{AGE}\\9.70 & \text { Grp } 1 \\10.40 & \text { Grp 2 } \\11.80 & \text { Grp } 3\end{array}
Mean
9.70
10.40
11.80
AGE
Grp
1
Grp 2
Grp
3
-Consult Table 11-2. What kind of research design is this?
Question 64
Multiple Choice
Questions refer to Table 11-2. In this study, 10 children completed a survey regarding their impressions of smokers at age 8 and then again at age 10 and 12. Scores could range from 1 (extreme negative impression of smokers) to 20 (extreme positive impression of smokers) . Table 11-2
GROUP
N
MEAN
STD DEV
STD ERROR
1
(AGE 8)
10
9.70
5.89
1.86
2
(AGE 10)
10
10.40
5.58
1.76
3
(AGE 12)
10
11.80
5.94
1.88
\begin{array} { c c c c c } \text { GROUP } & \mathrm { N } & \text { MEAN } & \text { STD DEV } & \text { STD ERROR } \\ 1 \text { (AGE 8) } & 10 & 9.70 & 5.89 & 1.86 \\ 2 \text { (AGE 10) } & 10 & 10.40 & 5.58 & 1.76 \\ 3 \text { (AGE 12) } & 10 & 11.80 & 5.94 & 1.88 \end{array}
GROUP
1
(AGE 8)
2
(AGE 10)
3
(AGE 12)
N
10
10
10
MEAN
9.70
10.40
11.80
STD DEV
5.89
5.58
5.94
STD ERROR
1.86
1.76
1.88
ONEWAY ANOVA: SMOKING by AGE (CORR SAMP)
SUM OF
MEAN
SOURCE
SQUARES
DF
SQUARES
F RATIO
PROB.
AGE
22.87
2
11.43
6.76
.
006
SUBJECTS
879.63
9
97.74
34.71
.
000
WITHIN CELLS
30.47
18
1.69
TOTAL
932.97
29
\begin{array} { l c c c r r } & \text { SUM OF } & \text { MEAN } & & \\ \text { SOURCE } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { DF } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { F RATIO } & \text { PROB. } \\ \text { AGE } & 22.87 & 2 & 11.43 & 6.76 & .006 \\\text { SUBJECTS } & 879.63 & 9 & 97.74 & 34.71 & .000 \\\text { WITHIN CELLS } & 30.47 & 18 & 1.69 & & \\\text { TOTAL } & 932.97 & 29 & & & \end{array}
SOURCE
AGE
SUBJECTS
WITHIN CELLS
TOTAL
SUM OF
SQUARES
22.87
879.63
30.47
932.97
MEAN
DF
2
9
18
29
SQUARES
11.43
97.74
1.69
F RATIO
6.76
34.71
PROB.
.006
.000
POST HOC TEST: Tukey-HSD with significance level .05 * Indicates significant differences shown for pairings
G
G
G
r
r
r
p
p
p
1
2
3
\begin{array} { l l l } \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } \\ \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } \\ \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \end{array}
G
r
p
1
G
r
p
2
G
r
p
3
Mean
A
G
E
9.70
Grp
1
10.40
Grp 2
11.80
Grp
3
\begin{array}{ll}\text { Mean } & \mathrm{AGE}\\9.70 & \text { Grp } 1 \\10.40 & \text { Grp 2 } \\11.80 & \text { Grp } 3\end{array}
Mean
9.70
10.40
11.80
AGE
Grp
1
Grp 2
Grp
3
-Consult Table 11-1. Why are the degrees of freedom between groups equal to 2?
Question 65
Multiple Choice
Questions refer to Table 11-2. In this study, 10 children completed a survey regarding their impressions of smokers at age 8 and then again at age 10 and 12. Scores could range from 1 (extreme negative impression of smokers) to 20 (extreme positive impression of smokers) . Table 11-2
GROUP
N
MEAN
STD DEV
STD ERROR
1
(AGE 8)
10
9.70
5.89
1.86
2
(AGE 10)
10
10.40
5.58
1.76
3
(AGE 12)
10
11.80
5.94
1.88
\begin{array} { c c c c c } \text { GROUP } & \mathrm { N } & \text { MEAN } & \text { STD DEV } & \text { STD ERROR } \\ 1 \text { (AGE 8) } & 10 & 9.70 & 5.89 & 1.86 \\ 2 \text { (AGE 10) } & 10 & 10.40 & 5.58 & 1.76 \\ 3 \text { (AGE 12) } & 10 & 11.80 & 5.94 & 1.88 \end{array}
GROUP
1
(AGE 8)
2
(AGE 10)
3
(AGE 12)
N
10
10
10
MEAN
9.70
10.40
11.80
STD DEV
5.89
5.58
5.94
STD ERROR
1.86
1.76
1.88
ONEWAY ANOVA: SMOKING by AGE (CORR SAMP)
SUM OF
MEAN
SOURCE
SQUARES
DF
SQUARES
F RATIO
PROB.
AGE
22.87
2
11.43
6.76
.
006
SUBJECTS
879.63
9
97.74
34.71
.
000
WITHIN CELLS
30.47
18
1.69
TOTAL
932.97
29
\begin{array} { l c c c r r } & \text { SUM OF } & \text { MEAN } & & \\ \text { SOURCE } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { DF } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { F RATIO } & \text { PROB. } \\ \text { AGE } & 22.87 & 2 & 11.43 & 6.76 & .006 \\\text { SUBJECTS } & 879.63 & 9 & 97.74 & 34.71 & .000 \\\text { WITHIN CELLS } & 30.47 & 18 & 1.69 & & \\\text { TOTAL } & 932.97 & 29 & & & \end{array}
SOURCE
AGE
SUBJECTS
WITHIN CELLS
TOTAL
SUM OF
SQUARES
22.87
879.63
30.47
932.97
MEAN
DF
2
9
18
29
SQUARES
11.43
97.74
1.69
F RATIO
6.76
34.71
PROB.
.006
.000
POST HOC TEST: Tukey-HSD with significance level .05 * Indicates significant differences shown for pairings
G
G
G
r
r
r
p
p
p
1
2
3
\begin{array} { l l l } \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } & \mathrm { G } \\ \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } & \mathrm { r } \\ \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } & \mathrm { p } \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \end{array}
G
r
p
1
G
r
p
2
G
r
p
3
Mean
A
G
E
9.70
Grp
1
10.40
Grp 2
11.80
Grp
3
\begin{array}{ll}\text { Mean } & \mathrm{AGE}\\9.70 & \text { Grp } 1 \\10.40 & \text { Grp 2 } \\11.80 & \text { Grp } 3\end{array}
Mean
9.70
10.40
11.80
AGE
Grp
1
Grp 2
Grp
3
-Consult Table 11-1. What kind of research design is this?
Question 66
Essay
What does it mean for an experiment to be confounded? Describe an example of a confounded experiment using multiple groups.
Question 67
Essay
In the following study, participants were randomly assigned to receive humanistic therapy, psychodynamic therapy, or behavioral therapy for their depression. Six months after therapy ended, participants' levels of depression were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all depressed) to 15 (extremely depressed).
GROUP
N
MEAN
STD DEV
STD ERROR
1 (humanistic)
10
5.40
2.17
0.69
2 (psychodynamic)
10
7.50
2.84
0.90
3 (behavioral)
10
5.60
3.13
0.99
\begin{array}{lcccc}{\text { GROUP }} & \text { N } & \text { MEAN } & \text { STD DEV } & \text { STD ERROR } \\\text { 1 (humanistic) } & 10 & 5.40 & 2.17 & 0.69 \\\text { 2 (psychodynamic) } & 10 & 7.50 & 2.84 & 0.90 \\\text { 3 (behavioral) } & 10 & 5.60 & 3.13 & 0.99\end{array}
GROUP
1 (humanistic)
2 (psychodynamic)
3 (behavioral)
N
10
10
10
MEAN
5.40
7.50
5.60
STD DEV
2.17
2.84
3.13
STD ERROR
0.69
0.90
0.99
ONEWAY ANOVA: THERAPY bY DEPRESSION
SUM OF
MEAN
SOURCE
SQUARES
DF
SQUARES
F RATIO
PROB.
BETWEEN GROUPS
26.87
2
13.73
1.78
.
187
WTHIN GROUPS
203.30
27
7.53
TOTAL
230.17
29
\begin{array} { l c c c c c } & \text { SUM OF } & & \text { MEAN } & & \\ \text { SOURCE } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { DF } & \text { SQUARES } & \text { F RATIO } & \text { PROB. } \\ & & & & & \\ \text { BETWEEN GROUPS } & 26.87 & 2 & 13.73 & 1.78 & .187 \\ \text { WTHIN GROUPS } & 203.30 & 27 & 7.53 & & \\ \text { TOTAL } & 230.17 & 29 & & & \end{array}
SOURCE
BETWEEN GROUPS
WTHIN GROUPS
TOTAL
SUM OF
SQUARES
26.87
203.30
230.17
DF
2
27
29
MEAN
SQUARES
13.73
7.53
F RATIO
1.78
PROB.
.187
POST HOC TEST: Tukey-HSD with significance level .05 * Indicates significant differences shown for pairings
G
G
G
r
r
r
p
p
p
1
2
3
\begin{array}{lll}G & G & G \\r & r & r \\p & p & p \\1 & 2 & 3\end{array}
G
r
p
1
G
r
p
2
G
r
p
3
Mean
THERAPY
5.40
Grp 1
7.50
Grp 2
5.60
Grp 3
\begin{array}{ll}\text { Mean}& \text { THERAPY }\\5.40 & \text { Grp 1 } \\7.50 & \text { Grp 2 } \\5.60 & \text { Grp 3 }\end{array}
Mean
5.40
7.50
5.60
THERAPY
Grp 1
Grp 2
Grp 3
-What is the independent variable in this study?
Question 68
Multiple Choice
The belief that explanations of phenomena should remain simple until the simple explanations are no longer valid is known as the
Question 69
Essay
According to your text, "You find a research idea when you identify a gap in the current knowledge base…" . What was the gap in the knowledge base, according to the authors?