In the Case of WeGo Kayaking Ltd

Multiple Choice

In the case of WeGo Kayaking Ltd. v. Sewid,

A) malice defeated the defences of qualified privilege and fair comment.
B) Sevid successfully argued the defence of qualified privilege.
C) Sevid successfully argued the defence of fair comment.
D) there was no defamation because innuendo cannot be defamatory.
E) there was no defamation because the people alleging defamation were dishonest.