Is This Syllogism Valid

Multiple Choice

Is this syllogism valid?

A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion.
B) No, because the premises make a narrower claim than the conclusion.
C) No, because the conclusion is that something exists in the overlap of the S and P circles, but the premises only say that something might exist there.
D) Yes.
E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.