Essay
Assume a two-country two-good two-input model. Let the countries in the model be the United States and the Rest of the World and the goods be steel and wheat. The two factors of production are capital and land. Further, the United States is capital-abundant and steel production is capital-intensive. Suppose, in the absence of trade, the United States operates at a point on its production-possibility curve where it produces and consumes 20 units of wheat and 20 units of steel. Once it engages in free trade, the international price of one unit of steel is two units of wheat. In response to the opening of trade, the United States moves along its production-possibility curve to a new point where it produces 30 units of steel and 10 units of wheat. Is the United States better-off following the opening of trade? Provide a logical proof of your answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The opening of trade allows the United S...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q17: Assume a two-country, two-good, and two-input model.
Q18: Assume a two-country two-good two-input model where
Q19: Which of the following economists proposed an
Q20: Which of the following best explains why
Q21: The figure given below shows the production-possibility
Q23: In a two-country two-good model, the opening
Q24: Assume a two-country two-good two-input model where
Q25: Assume a two-country two-good two-input model where
Q26: The figure given below shows the post-trade
Q27: Assume a two-country two-good two-input model where