Damisch, Stroberock, and Mussweiller (2010) Conducted a Series of Experiments

Multiple Choice

Damisch, Stroberock, and Mussweiller (2010) conducted a series of experiments on whether having a lucky charm could improve performance. One of the studies showed clear benefits of superstition on cognitive performance, while an experiment by Calin-Jageman and Caldwell (2014) attempted but failed to replicate the Damisch et al. findings. Which is the BEST interpretation of the results from both studies?

A) The two studies suggest that engaging in superstitious behaviors can enhance cognitive performance.
B) The discrepancy in the results of the two studies raises questions about whether engaging in superstitious behaviors can enhance cognitive performance.
C) The Damisch et al. study provides clear evidence that engaging in superstitious behaviors can enhance cognitive performance, and others agree.
D) The discrepancy in the results of the two studies leads to the conclusion that engaging in superstitious behaviors does not enhance cognitive performance.