Multiple Choice
What was the ruling of the court in the case of Welge v. Planters Lifesavers Co., the case in which the plaintiff injured his hand when a jar containing peanuts broke?
A) That the case would be dismissed because the plaintiff could not establish that the jar was maintained in a pristine condition after its purchase.
B) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because negligence in manufacture of the jar could not be established.
C) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because he was not the actual purchaser of the jar of peanuts.
D) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because negligence was established.
E) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because the defendant was unable to establish that the jar had been damaged after its purchase.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: A producer of razor blades need not
Q74: [Disappointing Boat Purchase] Ava went to purchase
Q75: The state-of-the-art defense is not available in
Q76: Which of the following was true prior
Q77: What four factors did the U.S. Supreme
Q79: [Scissors Injury] Yvonne bought a new pair
Q80: What was the result in Radford v.
Q81: Which of the following is true in
Q82: A manufacturer of a raw material, such
Q83: Which of the following defenses identifies that