Multiple Choice
Ward Planter exclusively grew soybeans from 2011 to 2013 and participated in the marketing loan program of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. If the "crop price" of soybeans at harvest was less than the preharvest "loan price," Planter could
A) sell his crop in the market and receive the difference between the crop price and loan price as a direct payment from the federal government.
B) take a "crop credit" based on the difference between the crop price and the loan price and use the credit to reduce federal income taxes owed.
C) receive an "emergency loan" that could be paid back over the following five years.
D) forfeit the harvest to the lender and be free of the loan, thus receiving a subsidy because the proceeds from the loan exceeded the revenues from the sale of the crop in the market.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q219: The price parity concept, which is a
Q220: Increases in incomes usually result in more
Q221: Public choice theory would suggest that the
Q222: The misallocation of resources associated with price
Q223: Due to high fixed costs relative to
Q225: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB8602/.jpg" alt=" Refer to the
Q226: A source of demand volatility for agricultural
Q227: A declining parity ratio implies that the<br>A)prices
Q228: Incomes of U.S. farmers are adversely affected
Q229: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB8602/.jpg" alt=" Refer to the