In the Case of Pittsley V

Multiple Choice

In the case of Pittsley v. Houser, the court:

A) held that the contract should be severed into different parts, applying the UCC to the part of the contract involving goods and the common law to the services part of the contract.
B) held that the "predominant factor" test contravened the UCC's declared purpose.
C) found the "predominant factor" test was the better, more prudent rule.
D) found the CISG governed the contract in question.