Multiple Choice
Law enforcement officers planted a tracking beeper on the clothing of an individual in order to track him/her from one location to another.Shortly thereafter,the individual traveled home where the movements of the person within the residence were tracked.This police activity is:
A) constitutional because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a tracking device does not invade a person's privacy.
B) constitutional because the tracking device was originally planted at a location other than the private residence of the individual.
C) unconstitutional because the in-home movements of the individual were not generally open to visual surveillance.
D) unconstitutional because tracker devices cannot be used in any context.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: The plain view rule applies only to
Q20: Under the plain view doctrine, an officer
Q23: An officer makes a Terry stop of
Q26: Officers who are lawfully on premises in
Q40: The primary justification for the plain view
Q42: A federal officer with an arrest warrant
Q47: Describe the findings of United States v.
Q49: A commercial airline has called the police
Q50: If the contents of a container can
Q55: Minnesota v.Dickerson,508 U.S.366 (1993),applied the principles of