Solved

In the 1976 Case of Imbler V

Question 17

Multiple Choice

In the 1976 case of Imbler v. Pachtman, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that when prosecutors act within the scope of their legal duties they enjoy:


A) Absolute immunity from civil damages arising from the conduct
B) Limited immunity from civil damages arising from the conduct
C) Qualified immunity from civil damages arising from the conduct
D) None of the above

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q12: U.S. Supreme Court justices are not bound

Q13: Should members of the U.S. Supreme Court

Q14: "Han Solo" attorneys employ whatever tactics are

Q15: According to the ABA's Criminal Justice Standards

Q16: Do you think that model standards or

Q18: Prosecutors enjoy absolute immunity from civil damages

Q19: "Rambo attorneys":<br>A) Put the client and/or the

Q20: Is it ethical for a prosecutor or

Q21: When assessing whether a mistake in case

Q22: Prosecutorial "moral fascism" represents an extremist view