True/False
A man is walking his dog in the park. The dog bites a toddler, who does nothing to provoke the dog. The man is held liable in negligence. Only when the reasoning of the court is known can one establish exactly why the court found the man liable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q13: Obiter dicta will only be binding on
Q14: In case 2, a woman was walking
Q15: Which of the following statements are incorrect
Q16: In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]
Q17: 'One man's obiter may be the next
Q19: In case 1, a man was walking
Q20: Which of the following statements are correct
Q21: In case 1, a man was walking
Q22: In case 1, a man was walking
Q23: In case 1, a man was walking