Multiple Choice
In case 1, a man was walking his Rottweiler dog in the park. The dog bit a woman in an unprovoked attack. The dog had bitten someone before and the owner was aware of this.
Which of the following would be the narrowest facts?
A) The case applies only to Rottweiler dogs being walked in a park.
B) The case applies only to dogs being walked in a park.
C) The case applies to all dangerous animals.
D) The case applies to all animals.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Obiter dicta will only be binding on
Q14: In case 2, a woman was walking
Q15: Which of the following statements are incorrect
Q16: In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]
Q17: 'One man's obiter may be the next
Q18: A man is walking his dog in
Q19: In case 1, a man was walking
Q20: Which of the following statements are correct
Q21: In case 1, a man was walking
Q23: In case 1, a man was walking