Multiple Choice
If taste aversion learning produces a visceral, noncognitive association that changes the hedonic value of a flavor, then
A) increasing or decreasing the intensity of the US after taste aversion has been learned should increase or decrease the strength of the aversion.
B) adapting the subject to the training US by making it less pleasant or aversive after the taste aversion has been learned should not affect the strength of the taste aversion.
C) once a taste aversion or taste preference has been learned, it should be impossible to change the hedonic value of the flavor.
D) we should see a differences in the rates and strength of conditioning in human versus nonhuman animals.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q67: Which aspects of taste aversion learning called
Q68: If a second relevant CS is presented
Q69: A researcher is short on time and
Q70: Ethologists and psychologists would likely find common
Q71: One group of subjects in a study
Q73: If Seligman is correct in his assumption
Q74: General laws of learning could have resulted
Q75: Is the lack of a US revaluation
Q76: Consider the hypothetical study below, in which
Q77: Research on taste aversions and preferences has