Blood Tests Often Serve the Useful Purpose of Identification in Criminal

Multiple Choice

Blood tests often serve the useful purpose of identification in criminal cases. In considering the admissibility of such tests, it is generally agreed that:

A) the trial court has wide latitude in ruling on the admissibility of the results of a blood grouping test.
B) it is error for a judge to allow evidence that the defendant was a member of a class consisting of a percentage of the male population.
C) it is improper to use blood comparison evidence to show that the blood types of the defendant and the victim were different.
D) while whole blood may be used for comparison purposes, the results of typing of aged, dried blood stains is inadmissible.