Multiple Choice
Testimony relating to fingerprint comparisons:
A) is not admissible unless the defendant is given the Miranda warnings.
B) is admissible for purposes of comparing prints with records on file but not for purposes of comparison with fingerprints left at the scene of a crime.
C) is not admissible because the judge cannot take judicial notice of the fact that fingerprint identification is one of the surest methods of identification.
D) is admissible in establishing the identification of the accused if the person giving the testimony qualifies as a fingerprint expert.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The courts have established rules concerning the
Q8: In jurisdictions in which the results of
Q9: In People v. Wilkinson, the defendant wanted
Q10: Blood tests often serve the useful purpose
Q11: Several courts have considered the use of
Q13: Is testimony regarding fingerprint comparisons for identification
Q14: In People v. Wilkinson, the defendant wanted
Q15: In City of Cleveland Heights v. Katz,
Q16: In City of Cleveland Heights v. Katz,
Q17: How does one qualify as a witness