Multiple Choice
In advocating the proposition "equipping cars with anti-lock brakes does not reduce accidents," an argument claiming "drivers with ABS-equipped cars drive faster and follow closer than drivers without ABS" would constitute
A) an effect argument.
B) an inherency argument.
C) a significance argument.
D) a pre-emptive argument.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: As an advocate for a proposition of
Q6: In factual argumentation, arguments about significance focus
Q7: In preparing to oppose a factual proposition,
Q8: The opponent in factual argumentation may not
Q9: The opponent's strategy of extenuation is a
Q11: A brief should contain your main points,
Q12: The opponents final strategic decision is to<br>A)determine
Q13: In opposing the proposition "equipping cars with
Q14: A denial argument suggests the advocate's argument
Q15: In factual argumentation, arguments about focus on